Literature DB >> 19885230

Miscoding and other user errors: importance of ongoing education for proper blood glucose monitoring procedures.

Linda E Schrock1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article reviews the literature to date and reports on a new study that documented the frequency of manual code-requiring blood glucose (BG) meters that were miscoded at the time of the patient's initial appointment in a hospital-based outpatient diabetes education program.
METHOD: Between January 1 and May 31, 2007, the type of BG meter and the accuracy of the patient's meter code (if required) and procedure for checking BG were checked during the initial appointment with the outpatient diabetes educator. If indicated, reeducation regarding the procedure for the BG meter code entry and/or BG test was provided.
RESULTS: Of the 65 patients who brought their meter requiring manual entry of a code number or code chip to the initial appointment, 16 (25%) were miscoded at the time of the appointment. Two additional problems, one of dead batteries and one of improperly stored test strips, were identified and corrected at the first appointment.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of checking the patient's BG meter code (if required) and procedure for testing BG at each encounter with a health care professional or providing the patient with a meter that does not require manual entry of a code number or chip to match the container of test strips (i.e., an autocode meter).

Entities:  

Keywords:  autocode; autocoded blood glucose meter; blood glucose; blood glucose meter; manual code; miscoded meter; patient education; user error

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885230      PMCID: PMC2769775          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes self-management education core outcomes measures.

Authors:  Kathryn Mulcahy; Melinda Maryniuk; Malinda Peeples; Mark Peyrot; Donna Tomky; Todd Weaver; Peggy Yarborough
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Kari Nerhus; Geir Thue; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  A Rosetta stone for insulin treatment: self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  William E Winter
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Benefits and limitations of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

5.  Meal-related structured self-monitoring of blood glucose: effect on diabetes control in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Schwedes; Markus Siebolds; Gabriele Mertes
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: a study in reducing calibration errors.

Authors:  John M Baum; Nanette M Monhaut; Donald R Parker; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Assuring the accuracy of home glucose monitoring.

Authors:  William A Alto; Daniel Meyer; James Schneid; Paul Bryson; Jon Kindig
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

8.  Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002.

Authors:  Paul Hogan; Tim Dall; Plamen Nikolov
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters.

Authors:  Charles H Raine; Linda E Schrock; Steven V Edelman; Sunder Raj D Mudaliar; Weiping Zhong; Lois J Proud; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

10.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study.

Authors:  B Guerci; P Drouin; V Grangé; P Bougnères; P Fontaine; V Kerlan; P Passa; Ch Thivolet; B Vialettes; B Charbonnel
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.041

View more
  2 in total

1.  Individuals achieve more accurate results with meters that are codeless and employ dynamic electrochemistry.

Authors:  Anoop Rao; Meg Wiley; Sridhar Iyengar; Dan Nadeau; Julie Carnevale
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  An analysis: to code or not to code-that is the question.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.