BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a prototype noninvasive alarm system (HypoMon) for the detection of nocturnal hypoglycemia. A prospective cohort study evaluated an alarm system that included a sensor belt, a radio frequency transmitter for chest belt signals, and a receiver. The receiver incorporated integrated "real-time" algorithms designed to recognize hypoglycemia "signatures" in the physiological parameters monitored by the sensor belt. METHODS: Fifty-two children and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) participated in this blinded, prospective, in-clinic, overnight study. Participants had a mean age of 16 years (standard deviation 2.1, range 12-20 years) and were asked to follow their normal meal and insulin routines for the day of the study. Participants had physiological parameters monitored overnight by a single HypoMon system. Their BG levels were also monitored overnight at regular intervals via an intravenous cannula and read on two independent Yellow Springs Instruments analyzers. Hypoglycemia was not induced by any manipulations of diabetes management, rather the subjects were monitored overnight for "natural" occurrences of hypoglycemia. Performance analyses included comparing HypoMon system alarm times with allowed time windows associated with each hypoglycemic event. RESULTS: The primary recognition algorithm in the prototype alarm system performed at a level consistent with expectations based on prior user surveys. The HypoMon system correctly recognized 8 out of the 11 naturally occurring overnight hypoglycemic events and falsely alarmed on 13 out of the remaining 41 normal nights [sensitivity 73% (8/11), specificity 68% (28/41), positive predictive value 38%,negative predictive value 90%]. CONCLUSION: The prototype HypoMon shows potential as an adjunct method for noninvasive overnight monitoring for hypoglycemia events in young people with T1DM. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a prototype noninvasive alarm system (HypoMon) for the detection of nocturnal hypoglycemia. A prospective cohort study evaluated an alarm system that included a sensor belt, a radio frequency transmitter for chest belt signals, and a receiver. The receiver incorporated integrated "real-time" algorithms designed to recognize hypoglycemia "signatures" in the physiological parameters monitored by the sensor belt. METHODS: Fifty-two children and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) participated in this blinded, prospective, in-clinic, overnight study. Participants had a mean age of 16 years (standard deviation 2.1, range 12-20 years) and were asked to follow their normal meal and insulin routines for the day of the study. Participants had physiological parameters monitored overnight by a single HypoMon system. Their BG levels were also monitored overnight at regular intervals via an intravenous cannula and read on two independent Yellow Springs Instruments analyzers. Hypoglycemia was not induced by any manipulations of diabetes management, rather the subjects were monitored overnight for "natural" occurrences of hypoglycemia. Performance analyses included comparing HypoMon system alarm times with allowed time windows associated with each hypoglycemic event. RESULTS: The primary recognition algorithm in the prototype alarm system performed at a level consistent with expectations based on prior user surveys. The HypoMon system correctly recognized 8 out of the 11 naturally occurring overnight hypoglycemic events and falsely alarmed on 13 out of the remaining 41 normal nights [sensitivity 73% (8/11), specificity 68% (28/41), positive predictive value 38%,negative predictive value 90%]. CONCLUSION: The prototype HypoMon shows potential as an adjunct method for noninvasive overnight monitoring for hypoglycemia events in young people with T1DM. 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.
Authors: William L Clarke; Stacey Anderson; Leon Farhy; Marc Breton; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Daniel Cox; Boris Kovatchev Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rakesh Amin; Karen Ross; Carlo L Acerini; Julie A Edge; Justin Warner; David B Dunger Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: T W Jones; P Porter; R S Sherwin; E A Davis; P O'Leary; F Frazer; G Byrne; S Stick; W V Tamborlane Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jesper Fleischer; Simon Lebech Cichosz; Poul Erik Jakobsen; Knud Yderstraede; Elisabeth Gulichsen; Hans Nygaard; Ebbe Eldrup; Hans Henrik Lervang; Lise Tarnow; Niels Ejskjaer Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2015-01-14
Authors: Victor N Skladnev; Stanislav Tarnavskii; Thomas McGregor; Nejhdeh Ghevondian; Steve Gourlay; Timothy W Jones Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-01-01
Authors: Ole Elvebakk; Christian Tronstad; Kåre I Birkeland; Trond G Jenssen; Marit R Bjørgaas; Kathrine F Frøslie; Kristin Godang; Håvard Kalvøy; Ørjan G Martinsen; Hanne L Gulseth Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 4.379