Literature DB >> 20161653

Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity.

Melvin J Yap1, Chi-Shing Tse, David A Balota.   

Abstract

Word frequency and semantic priming effects are among the most robust effects in visual word recognition, and it has been generally assumed that these two variables produce interactive effects in lexical decision performance, with larger priming effects for low-frequency targets. The results from four lexical decision experiments indicate that the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency are critically dependent upon differences in the vocabulary knowledge of the participants. Specifically, across two Universities, additive effects of the two variables were observed in participants with more vocabulary knowledge, while interactive effects were observed in participants with less vocabulary knowledge. These results are discussed with reference to Borowsky and Besner's (1993) multistage account and Plaut and Booth's (2000) single-mechanism model. In general, the findings are also consistent with a flexible lexical processing system that optimizes performance based on processing fluency and task demands.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161653      PMCID: PMC2818444          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  36 in total

1.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  How lexical decision is affected by recent experience: symmetric versus asymmetric frequency-blocking effects.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Michael C Mozer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

3.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?

Authors:  Ron Borowsky; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-05

6.  Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access.

Authors:  V C Milota; A A Widau; M R McMickell; J F Juola; G B Simpson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-05

7.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model.

Authors:  R Borowsky; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effects of word frequency and modality on sentence comprehension impairments in people with aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.

Authors:  Gemma A L Evans; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Anna M Woollams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

4.  Does the familiarity bias hypothesis explain why there is no masked priming for "NO" decisions?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

5.  Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Gail Y Lim; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

6.  Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Daragh E Sibley; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms.

Authors:  Bianca de Wit; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

8.  Visual word recognition across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Emily R Cohen-Shikora; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06-23

9.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.