Literature DB >> 20161401

Becoming Irreplaceable: How Comparisons to the Partner's Alternatives Differentially Affect Low and High Self-Esteem People.

Sandra L Murray1, Sadie Leder, Jennifer C D McClellan, John G Holmes, Rebecca T Pinkus, Brianna Harris.   

Abstract

It is proposed that people are motivated to feel hard to replace in romantic relationships because feeling irreplaceable fosters trust in a partner's continued responsiveness. By contrast, feeling replaceable motivates compensatory behavior aimed at strengthening the partner's commitment to the relationship. A correlational study of dating couples and 2 experiments examined how satiating/thwarting the goal of feeling irreplaceable differentially affects relationship perception and behavior for low and high self-esteem people. The results revealed that satiating the goal of feeling irreplaceable increases trust for people low in self-esteem. In contrast, thwarting the goal of feeling irreplaceable increases compensatory behaviors meant to prove one's indispensability for people high in self-esteem.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161401      PMCID: PMC2783625          DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1031


  20 in total

1.  Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: how perceived regard regulates attachment processes.

Authors:  S L Murray; J G Holmes; D W Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: an attachment theoretical perspective.

Authors:  B C Feeney; N L Collins
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Interdependence, interaction, and relationships.

Authors:  Caryl E Rusbult; Paul A M Van Lange
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem".

Authors:  Jon K Maner; C Nathan DeWall; Roy F Baumeister; Mark Schaller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-01

6.  Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; John G Holmes; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: a levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Jaye L Derrick; Sadie Leder; John G Holmes
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Putting the partner within reach: a dyadic perspective on felt security in close relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Paul Rose; John G Holmes; Jaye Derrick; Eric J Podchaski; Gina Bellavia; Dale W Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-02

9.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet.

Authors:  K D Williams; C K Cheung; W Choi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

10.  Fostering partner dependence as trust insurance: the implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Maya Aloni; John G Holmes; Jaye L Derrick; Danu Anthony Stinson; Sadie Leder
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships.

Authors:  Sandra L Murray; Rebecca T Pinkus; John G Holmes; Brianna Harris; Sarah Gomillion; Maya Aloni; Jaye L Derrick; Sadie Leder
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-09

2.  When low self-esteem encourages behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence: the role of relational self-construal [corrected].

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-04-15

3.  Shared Relationship Efficacy of Dyad Can Increase Life Satisfaction in Close Relationships: Multilevel Study.

Authors:  Ryosuke Asano; Kenichi Ito; Toshikazu Yoshida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.