Literature DB >> 11079239

Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet.

K D Williams1, C K Cheung, W Choi.   

Abstract

Ostracism is such a widely used and powerful tactic that the authors tested whether people would be affected by it even under remote and artificial circumstances. In Study 1, 1,486 participants from 62 countries accessed the authors' on-line experiment on the Internet. They were asked to use mental visualization while playing a virtual tossing game with two others (who were actually computer generated and controlled). Despite the minimal nature of their experience, the more participants were ostracized, the more they reported feeling bad, having less control, and losing a sense of belonging. In Study 2, ostracized participants were more likely to conform on a subsequent task. The results are discussed in terms of supporting K. D. Williams's (1997) need threat theory of ostracism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079239     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  313 in total

1.  Associations Between Behavioral Inhibition and Children's Social Problem Solving Behavior During Social Exclusion.

Authors:  Olga L Walker; Heather A Henderson; Kathryn A Degnan; Elizabeth C Penela; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2014-08

2.  Dissociable brain mechanisms for processing social exclusion and rule violation.

Authors:  Danielle Z Bolling; Naomi B Pitskel; Ben Deen; Michael J Crowley; James C McPartland; Linda C Mayes; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Adolescent social cognitive and affective neuroscience: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Jennifer H Pfeifer; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Family socioeconomic status modulates the coping-related neural response of offspring.

Authors:  Kuniaki Yanagisawa; Keita Masui; Kaichiro Furutani; Michio Nomura; Hiroshi Yoshida; Mitsuhiro Ura
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection.

Authors:  Carrie L Masten; Eva H Telzer; Andrew J Fuligni; Matthew D Lieberman; Naomi I Eisenberger
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Neurophysiological and Psychological Consequences of Social Exclusion: The Effects of Cueing In-Group and Out-Group Status.

Authors:  Michael Jenkins; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-08-29

7.  Prefrontal recruitment during social rejection predicts greater subsequent self-regulatory imbalance and impairment: neural and longitudinal evidence.

Authors:  David S Chester; C Nathan DeWall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Psychological and Biological Validation of a Novel Digital Social Peer Evaluation Experiment (digi-SPEE).

Authors:  Claudia Menne-Lothmann; Jeroen Decoster; Ruud van Winkel; Dina Collip; Bart P F Rutten; Philippe Delespaul; Marc De Hert; Catherine Derom; Evert Thiery; Nele Jacobs; Jim van Os; Marieke Wichers
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

9.  Differential Susceptibility to Parenting in Adolescent Girls: Moderation by Neural Sensitivity to Social Cues.

Authors:  Karen D Rudolph; Megan M Davis; Haina H Modi; Carina Fowler; Yuji Kim; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2018-09-30

10.  Measuring neural and behavioral activity during ongoing computerized social interactions: an examination of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Jason R Themanson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.