Literature DB >> 32027582

Pre-output Language Monitoring in Sign Production.

Stephanie K Riès1,2, Linda Nadalet1, Soren Mickelsen1, Megan Mott1, Katherine J Midgley1, Phillip J Holcomb1,2, Karen Emmorey1,2.   

Abstract

A domain-general monitoring mechanism is proposed to be involved in overt speech monitoring. This mechanism is reflected in a medial frontal component, the error negativity (Ne), present in both errors and correct trials (Ne-like wave) but larger in errors than correct trials. In overt speech production, this negativity starts to rise before speech onset and is therefore associated with inner speech monitoring. Here, we investigate whether the same monitoring mechanism is involved in sign language production. Twenty deaf signers (American Sign Language [ASL] dominant) and 16 hearing signers (English dominant) participated in a picture-word interference paradigm in ASL. As in previous studies, ASL naming latencies were measured using the keyboard release time. EEG results revealed a medial frontal negativity peaking within 15 msec after keyboard release in the deaf signers. This negativity was larger in errors than correct trials, as previously observed in spoken language production. No clear negativity was present in the hearing signers. In addition, the slope of the Ne was correlated with ASL proficiency (measured by the ASL Sentence Repetition Task) across signers. Our results indicate that a similar medial frontal mechanism is engaged in preoutput language monitoring in sign and spoken language production. These results suggest that the monitoring mechanism reflected by the Ne/Ne-like wave is independent of output modality (i.e., spoken or signed) and likely monitors prearticulatory representations of language. Differences between groups may be linked to several factors including differences in language proficiency or more variable lexical access to motor programming latencies for hearing than deaf signers.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32027582      PMCID: PMC7234262          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  51 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

3.  Removal of muscle artifacts from EEG recordings of spoken language production.

Authors:  Maarten De Vos; De Maarten Vos; Stephanie Riès; Katrien Vanderperren; Bart Vanrumste; Francois-Xavier Alario; Sabine Van Huffel; Van Sabine Huffel; Boris Burle
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2010-06

4.  Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Rain Bosworth; Tanya Kraljic
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Bilingual processing of ASL-English code-blends: The consequences of accessing two lexical representations simultaneously.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Jennifer Petrich; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Motivation and semantic context affect brain error-monitoring activity: an event-related brain potentials study.

Authors:  Lesya Y Ganushchak; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Bimodal bilingualism and the frequency-lag hypothesis.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Jennifer A F Petrich; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2012-10-16

8.  ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Naomi K Caselli; Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04

9.  Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities.

Authors:  Clémence Roger; Christian G Bénar; Franck Vidal; Thierry Hasbroucq; Borís Burle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  How sensory-motor systems impact the neural organization for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Investigating the Link Between Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Cognitive Control in Bilinguals Using Laplacian-Transformed Event Related Potentials.

Authors:  Martha N Mendoza; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Robert T Knight; Stephanie K Ries
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 2.  Sign and Spoken Language Processing Differences in the Brain: A Brief Review of Recent Research.

Authors:  Hayley Bree Caldwell
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-15

3.  Characterizing multi-word speech production using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Stephanie K Ries; Svetlana Pinet; N Bonnie Nozari; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.