Literature DB >> 2016023

Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema.

N Anderson1, H B Cook, R Coates.   

Abstract

The radiographs and clinical records of 26 patients with colorectal cancer missed on barium enema, and subsequently detected at colonoscopy, were reviewed to determine the cause of radiological error. Twenty (77%) of the patients were female. In 24 of 26 patients, anemia and/or rectal bleeding was a presenting feature. Fourteen of the 26 (54%) missed cancers were in the sigmoid colon, 10 (38%) in the ascending colon or hepatic flexure, and two (8%) in the rectum. Tumor size ranged from 20-100 mm. Fifteen were polyps, and 11 annular cancers. Fourteen (54%) were Dukes C or D tumors. Twenty-eight barium enemas in 23 patients were available for review: 86% were double-contrast studies. In 18 (76%), the cancer could be seen in retrospect and, in over half, the tumor was obvious. The dominant perceptive error was due to missing the lesion in the barium pool. Other major errors were missing the lesion en face or in overlapping loops. As most cancers were missed because of observer perceptive error, by both experienced and inexperienced radiologists, the authors recommend double reporting of all barium enemas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2016023     DOI: 10.1007/bf01887325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  18 in total

1.  Radiographic findings in overlooked colon carcinomas. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 2.  Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Optimum overhead views in double-contrast barium-enema examinations.

Authors:  R L Eisenberg; P C Meyers; S T May
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Large bowel cancer in Auckland, New Zealand 1965-1975.

Authors:  P G Alley
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1981-08-26

5.  Colorectal cancer in New Zealand: a Wellington study.

Authors:  P R Turnbull; W H Isbister
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1979-02

6.  Perception errors with double-contrast enema after a positive guaiac test.

Authors:  J Kewenter; J Jensen; M Boijsen; G Lycke; U Tylén
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

7.  The radiographic features of small colon cancers.

Authors:  J Skucas; R F Spataro; D P Cannucciari
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

9.  Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; R Gardiner; W Vas; G W Stevenson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Colon polyps and carcinomas: prospective comparison of the single- and double-contrast examination in the same patients.

Authors:  A de Roos; J Hermans; P C Shaw; H Kroon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Guideline for referral of patients with suspected colorectal cancer by family physicians and other primary care providers.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Emily T Vella; Amanda Hey; Marko Simunovic; William Harris; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema service: initial experience.

Authors:  R M Mendelson; P J Kelsey; T Chakera
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun

4.  Double contrast barium enema and colorectal carcinoma: sensitivity and potential role in screening.

Authors:  J S Gillespie; B E Kelly
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2001-05

5.  Diagnostic miss rate for colorectal cancer: an audit.

Authors:  Mary Than; Jolene Witherspoon; Javed Shami; Prachi Patil; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Added value of double reading in diagnostic radiology,a systematic review.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.