Literature DB >> 3964926

Colon polyps and carcinomas: prospective comparison of the single- and double-contrast examination in the same patients.

A de Roos, J Hermans, P C Shaw, H Kroon.   

Abstract

Single-contrast (SC) and double-contrast (DC) colon examinations were compared in 425 consecutive patients for detection of polyps and stricturing carcinomas. Each patient was examined with both SC and DC during the same session. In patients with carcinoma, there was no significant difference between the two modalities. DC was far superior to SC for detection of rectal or colonic polyps (p less than 0.05); however, the techniques appeared to be complementary in the sigmoid and cecum. The authors conclude that DC is superior to SC as a means of screening for polyps of the rectum and colon, with SC being useful as an adjunct in problem areas such as the sigmoid and cecum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3964926     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.154.1.3964926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema.

Authors:  N Anderson; H B Cook; R Coates
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

2.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Colorectal carcinomas: diagnostic implications of their changing frequency and anatomic distribution.

Authors:  G G Ghahremani; K Dowlatshahi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.