Literature DB >> 20158322

An actuarial approach to comparing early stage and late stage lung cancer mortality and survival.

Sara W Goldberg1, James L Mulshine, Dale Hagstrom, Bruce S Pyenson.   

Abstract

Comparing the mortality characteristics of different cohorts is an essential process in the life insurance industry. Pseudodisease, lead-time bias, and length bias, which are critical to determining the value of cancer screening, have close analogues in life insurance company management, including the temporal impact of underwriting. Ratios of all-cause mortality rates for cancer cohorts relative to standard population mortality rates can provide insights into early stage and late stage mortality differences, differences by age, sex, race, and histology, and allow modeling of biases associated with early stage detection or screening protocols. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data set has characteristics that allow efficient application of actuarial techniques. We show the mortality burden associated with treated early stage lung cancer and that identifying all lung cancers at early stage could reduce US lung cancer deaths by over 70,000 per year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20158322     DOI: 10.1089/pop.2009.0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Health Manag        ISSN: 1942-7891            Impact factor:   2.459


  11 in total

1.  Lung cancer stigma predicts timing of medical help-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Carla P Hermann; Judy Schreiber; Michael T Weaver; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Are Nursing Homes COVID-19's "Contaminated Wells," and Will They Receive Additional Resources?

Authors:  Bruce Pyenson; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2020-09

Review 3.  2016 reflections on the favorable cost-benefit of lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Bruce Pyenson; Gabriela Dieguez
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

4.  Offering lung cancer screening to high-risk medicare beneficiaries saves lives and is cost-effective: an actuarial analysis.

Authors:  Bruce S Pyenson; Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Rowena Yip; Ellynne Dec
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-08

5.  Early Detection of Lung Cancer with Meso Tetra (4-Carboxyphenyl) Porphyrin-Labeled Sputum.

Authors:  Lara Patriquin; Daniel T Merrick; David Hill; Richard G Holcomb; Madeleine E Lemieux; Gordon Bennett; Bijal Karia; Vivienne I Rebel; Thomas Bauer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  The Lake Wobegon effect: are all cancer patients above average?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Wolf; Kevin S Wolf
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Immune evasion before tumour invasion in early lung squamous carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Céline Mascaux; Mihaela Angelova; Angela Vasaturo; Jennifer Beane; Kahkeshan Hijazi; Geraldine Anthoine; Bénédicte Buttard; Françoise Rothe; Karen Willard-Gallo; Annick Haller; Vincent Ninane; Arsène Burny; Jean-Paul Sculier; Avi Spira; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Considering lead-time bias in evaluating the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with real-world data.

Authors:  Szu-Chun Yang; Jung-Der Wang; Shi-Yi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  CT scan screening for lung cancer: risk factors for nodules and malignancy in a high-risk urban cohort.

Authors:  Alissa K Greenberg; Feng Lu; Judith D Goldberg; Ellen Eylers; Jun-Chieh Tsay; Ting-An Yie; David Naidich; Georgeann McGuinness; Harvey Pass; Kam-Meng Tchou-Wong; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; Abraham Chachoua; Bernard Crawford; William N Rom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A cost-utility analysis of lung cancer screening and the additional benefits of incorporating smoking cessation interventions.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Yiding Jiang; David B Abrams; Bruce S Pyenson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.