Robert M Sweet1, David Hananel, Frances Lawrenz. 1. Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. rsweet@umn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To present modern educational psychology theory and apply these concepts to validity and reliability of surgical skills training and assessment. DESIGN: In a series of cross-disciplinary meetings, we applied a unified approach of behavioral science principles and theory to medical technical skills education given the recent advances in the theories in the field of behavioral psychology and statistics. CONCLUSIONS: While validation of the individual simulation tools is important, it is only one piece of a multimodal curriculum that in and of itself deserves examination and study. We propose concurrent validation throughout the design of simulation-based curriculum rather than once it is complete. We embrace the concept that validity and curriculum development are interdependent, ongoing processes that are never truly complete. Individual predictive, construct, content, and face validity aspects should not be considered separately but as interdependent and complementary toward an end application. Such an approach could help guide our acceptance and appropriate application of these exciting new training and assessment tools for technical skills training in medicine.
OBJECTIVE: To present modern educational psychology theory and apply these concepts to validity and reliability of surgical skills training and assessment. DESIGN: In a series of cross-disciplinary meetings, we applied a unified approach of behavioral science principles and theory to medical technical skills education given the recent advances in the theories in the field of behavioral psychology and statistics. CONCLUSIONS: While validation of the individual simulation tools is important, it is only one piece of a multimodal curriculum that in and of itself deserves examination and study. We propose concurrent validation throughout the design of simulation-based curriculum rather than once it is complete. We embrace the concept that validity and curriculum development are interdependent, ongoing processes that are never truly complete. Individual predictive, construct, content, and face validity aspects should not be considered separately but as interdependent and complementary toward an end application. Such an approach could help guide our acceptance and appropriate application of these exciting new training and assessment tools for technical skills training in medicine.
Authors: M Paschold; M Schröder; D W Kauff; T Gorbauch; M Herzer; H Lang; W Kneist Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Domenico Veneziano; Achilles Ploumidis; Silvia Proietti; Theodoros Tokas; Guido Kamphuis; Giovanni Tripepi; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Ali Gozen; Alberto Breda; Joan Palou; Kemal Sarica; Evangelos Liatsikos; Kamran Ahmed; Bhaskar K Somani Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Linh N Tran; Priyanka Gupta; Lauren H Poniatowski; Shaheen Alanee; Marc A Dall'era; Robert M Sweet Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2013-03-19
Authors: Anna H de Vries; Scheltus J van Luijk; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Ad J M Hendrikx; Evert L Koldewijn; Cordula Wagner; Barbara M A Schout Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: William H Dean; John Buchan; Fisseha Admassu; Min J Kim; Karl C Golnik; Andrew McNaught; Matthew Burton Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2019-08-18
Authors: Jan Ebbing; Peter N Wiklund; Olof Akre; Stefan Carlsson; Mats J Olsson; Jonas Höijer; Maurice Heimer; Justin W Collins Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 2.547