| Literature DB >> 20156336 |
Shawn A Ritchie1, Pearson W K Ahiahonu, Dushmanthi Jayasinghe, Doug Heath, Jun Liu, Yingshen Lu, Wei Jin, Amir Kavianpour, Yasuyo Yamazaki, Amin M Khan, Mohammad Hossain, Khine Khine Su-Myat, Paul L Wood, Kevin Krenitsky, Ichiro Takemasa, Masakazu Miyake, Mitsugu Sekimoto, Morito Monden, Hisahiro Matsubara, Fumio Nomura, Dayan B Goodenowe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are currently no accurate serum markers for detecting early risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We therefore developed a non-targeted metabolomics technology to analyse the serum of pre-treatment CRC patients in order to discover putative metabolic markers associated with CRC. Using tandem-mass spectrometry (MS/MS) high throughput MS technology we evaluated the utility of selected markers and this technology for discriminating between CRC and healthy subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20156336 PMCID: PMC2833138 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Summary of case-control populations used in this study
| FTICR-MS discovery | MRM validation | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genomics Collaborative | Seracare 1 | Osaka | Chiba | Seracare 2 | ||||||
| 40 | 50 | 26 | 25 | 46 | 35 | 40 | 40 | 70 | 70 | |
| 19 | 24 | 17 | 16 | 27 | - | 19 | 24 | 44 | 41 | |
| 59 (30-78) | 56 (30-78) | 62 (46-80) | 51 (35-70) | 63 (28-90) | - | 68 (45-91) | 48 (36-69) | 67 (39-87) | 63 (32-82) | |
| 20.9 ± 3.8 | 25.0 ± 0.9 | 24.3 ± 5.7 | 25.6 ± 4.6 | NA | - | NA | NA | 28.0 ± 4.8 | 26. ± 4.2 | |
| 21 | 26 | 9 | 9 | 19 | - | 21 | 16 | 26 | 29 | |
| 54 (40-82) | 55 (40-79) | 78 (59-86) | 55 (26-95) | 65 (31-77) | - | 70 (51-84) | 49 (39-59) | 73 (35-90) | 56 (26-86) | |
| 19.9 ± 4.6 | 24.8 ± 2.2 | 23 ± 3.2 | 29 ± 8.0 | NA | - | NA | NA | 25.5 ± 4.4 | 24.0 ± 4.5 | |
| 8 | - | 5 | - | 10 | - | 9 | - | 13 | - | |
| 16 | - | 8 | - | 14 | - | 18 | - | 21 | - | |
| 15 | - | 8 | - | 12 | - | 11 | - | 25 | - | |
| 1 | - | 2 | - | 8 | - | 2 | - | 7 | - | |
| 0 | - | 3 | - | 2 | - | 0 | - | 4 | - | |
BMI = body mass index; CRC = colorectal cancer; FTICT-MS = Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectroscopy; MRM = multiple reaction monitoring.
Figure 1Study design. The study comprised three phases: Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry metabolomic discovery in three independent sample sets, structural investigation and determination of metabolic biomarkers as hydroxylated polyunsaturated ultra long-chain fatty acids and validation using a triple-quadrupole multiple reaction monitoring targeted assay.
Figure 2Scatter plots of average sample peak intensity fold change between colorectal cancer (CRC) and normal patient sera in three independent studies. Sample-specific peaks for all subjects were log2 normalized to the mean of the control population, and plotted according to mass (Da). Points are coloured according to significance based on an unpaired Students't-test (see legend). (A) Genomics Collaborative Inc discovery population, (B) Seracare 1 discovery population, (C) Osaka discovery population. The region boxed in grey represents the cluster of masses between 440 and 600 Da consistently reduced in the CRC patient population compared to controls in all three cohorts.
Percent overlap between top 50 most discriminating masses (based on student's t-test) of each discovery project and masses showing P < 0.05 in the remaining cohorts
| Genomics Collaborative ( | Seracare ( | Osaka ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 46 (92%) | 31 (62%) | |
| 35 (70%) | - | 27 (54%) | |
| 44 (88%) | 47 (94%) | - |
List of 13 masses detected among the top 50 masses inclusive to all three discovery projects
| GCI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 446.3406 | C28H46O4 | 2.22 | NAPCI | 6.4E-13 | 0.31 |
| 13 | 448.3563 | C28H48O4 | 2.32 | NAPCI | 2.5E-12 | 0.41 |
| 8 | 466.3661 | C28H50O5 | 0.59 | NAPCI | 9.4E-13 | 0.25 |
| 7 | 468.3840 | C28H52O5 | 5.39 | NAPCI | 9.0E-13 | 0.27 |
| 21 | 492.3829 | C30H52O5 | 2.89 | NAPCI | 8.5E-11 | 0.33 |
| 24 | 494.3977 | C30H54O5 | 1.16 | NAPCI | 1.9E-10 | 0.35 |
| 29 | 518.3976 | C32H54O5 | 0.92 | NAPCI | 1.6E-09 | 0.37 |
| 12 | 538.4259 | C32H58O6 | 4.76 | NAPCI | 2.5E-12 | 0.30 |
| 44 | 574.4607 | C36H62O5 | 1.7 | NAPCI | 1.6E-08 | 0.40 |
| 26 | 576.4771 | C36H64O5 | 2.99 | NAPCI | 3.0E-10 | 0.37 |
| 32 | 578.4931 | C36H66O5 | 3.59 | NAPCI | 3.2E-09 | 0.34 |
| 11 | 592.4711 | C36H64O6 | 1.37 | NAPCI | 2.2E-12 | 0.27 |
| 15 | 594.4851 | C36H66O6 | 1.41 | NAPCI | 6.3E-12 | 0.26 |
| 45 | 446.3413 | C28H46O4 | 3.79 | NAPCI | 1.8E-06 | 0.36 |
| 9 | 448.3570 | C28H48O4 | 3.88 | NAPCI | 1.6E-08 | 0.36 |
| 3 | 466.3664 | C28H50O5 | 1.23 | NAPCI | 8.5E-10 | 0.34 |
| 6 | 468.3847 | C28H52O5 | 6.89 | NAPCI | 4.9E-09 | 0.36 |
| 17 | 492.3835 | C30H52O5 | 4.11 | NAPCI | 4.6E-08 | 0.42 |
| 34 | 494.3971 | C30H54O5 | 0.05 | NAPCI | 6.6E-07 | 0.41 |
| 11 | 518.3968 | C32H54O5 | 0.63 | NAPCI | 2.2E-08 | 0.33 |
| 18 | 538.4263 | C32H58O6 | 5.5 | NAPCI | 7.8E-08 | 0.38 |
| 32 | 574.4595 | C36H62O5 | 0.39 | NAPCI | 6.1E-07 | 0.32 |
| 42 | 576.4768 | C36H64O5 | 2.47 | NAPCI | 1.0E-06 | 0.37 |
| 49 | 578.4933 | C36H66O5 | 3.93 | NAPCI | 3.2E-06 | 0.42 |
| 30 | 592.4721 | C36H64O6 | 3.06 | NAPCI | 5.6E-07 | 0.27 |
| 50 | 594.4851 | C36H66O6 | 1.41 | NAPCI | 3.7E-06 | 0.32 |
| 6 | 446.3400 | C28H46O4 | 0.87 | NESI | 1.8E-10 | 0.44 |
| 13 | 448.3556 | C28H48O4 | 0.76 | NESI | 2.2E-09 | 0.54 |
| 1 | 466.3663 | C28H50O5 | 1.02 | NESI | 2.9E-12 | 0.50 |
| 5 | 468.3815 | C28H52O5 | 0.05 | NESI | 1.8E-10 | 0.49 |
| 4 | 492.3814 | C30H52O5 | 0.15 | NESI | 7.1E-11 | 0.57 |
| 23 | 494.3969 | C30H54O5 | 0.45 | NESI | 2.0E-07 | 0.62 |
| 39 | 518.3975 | C32H54O5 | 0.72 | NAPCI | 5.8E-06 | 0.52 |
| 19 | 538.4237 | C32H58O6 | 0.67 | NESI | 4.7E-08 | 0.58 |
| 16 | 574.4600 | C36H62O5 | 0.48 | NESI | 3.8E-09 | 0.42 |
| 7 | 576.4756 | C36H64O5 | 0.39 | NESI | 3.0E-10 | 0.42 |
| 14 | 578.4910 | C36H66O5 | 0.04 | NESI | 2.6E-09 | 0.50 |
| 15 | 592.4703 | C36H64O6 | 0.02 | NESI | 3.3E-09 | 0.41 |
| 3 | 594.4859 | C36H66O6 | 0.07 | NESI | 6.8E-11 | 0.40 |
Indicated are the rank order based on P-value, detected accurate mass, the computationally predicted molecular formula, the mass difference between the detected mass and mass of the predicted molecular formula in part per million, the mode of analysis (electrospray ionization, ESI; atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, APCI), the P-value (based on an unpaired student's t-test) between the average peak intensity of control subjects versus colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and the average peak intensity ratio between CRC patients and controls.
Figure 3Relative intensities of metabolites 446 and 448 by disease stage and the area under the curves for each discovery dataset. (A) Bar charts of relative intensity versus disease stage in each sample set; (B) summary of P-value comparisons between disease stages and controls for metabolites 446 and 448; (C) receiver operating curve analysis based on markers 446 and 448 and all CRCs versus all controls in each discovery set.
Figure 4Extracted mass spectrum of serum from normal subjects and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Extracts from five representative CRC and five control samples from the Genomics Collaborative discovery set were subject to high performance liquid chromatography followed by full-scan detection on an Applied Biosystems QSTAR XL™ mass spectrometer in atmospheric pressure chemical ionization negative mode. The average intensities of all ions within the mass range 100 to 700 Da eluting between 16 and 18 min are shown for each cohort. The boxed region indicates spectral features present in normal patients but absent from CRC-positive serum.
Tandem-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of selected 28-carbon containing masses
| Marker nominal neutral mass | 446 | 448 | 450 | 464 | 466 | 468 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral cut ions (%) | |||||||
*Ions m ay have been obtained from MS3 experiments
Tandem mass spectrometric results of various standards
| Standard | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*This terminology is specific to fatty acid fragmentation.
5S,6S-(7E,9E,11Z,14Z)-dihydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (1), 15S-Hydroxy-(5Z,8Z,11Z,13E)-eicosatetraenoic acid (2) and 8R-Hydroxy-(5Z,9E,11Z,14Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid (3) (Table 6), α-tocopherol (4) γ-tocopherol (5), 13-(6-hydroxy-2,7,8-trimethylchroman-2-yl)-2,6,10-trimethyltridecanoic acid (6), 16-(4,5-dimethyl-3,6-dioxo cyclohexa-1,4-dienyl)-2,6,10,14-tetramethylhexadecanoic acid (7), 6-hydroxy-2,7-dimethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)chroman-8-carbaldehyde (8), 6-hydroxy-2,7-dimethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)chroman-8-carboxylic acid (9), calciferol (10), cholecalciferol (11), ergosterol (12), phylloquinone (13), retinol (14) and 3β,7α-dihydroxy-5-cholestenoic acid (15).
1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data of colorectal cancer (CRC) biomarker pool (sample A) and their methyl esters
| Types of protons | CRC biomarker pool | Methyl esters of CRC biomarker pool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83-0.90 | 0.83-0.90 | |
| 1.21-1.24, m | 1.21-1.24, m | |
| - | 1.57-1.65, m | 1.53-1.69, m |
| - | 1.98-2.08, m | 1.94-2.03, m |
| 2.23-2.28, m | 2.23-2.31, m | |
| -CH=CH- | 2.75-2.79, m | 2.74-2.82, m |
| - | 3.64, s | |
| - | 3.45-3.71, 4.03-4.26 | 4.02-4.12, 4.16-4.26, 4.58-4.60 |
| - | 5.10-5.47, m | 5.08-5.40, m |
| -CH(OH) | 5.76-5.91, m | 5.75-5.90, m |
*NMR solvent is CDCl3, signals assigned using 2D NMR experiments (HMQC and HMBC)
Figure 5Results of triple-quadrupole multiple reaction monitoring analysis of the Seracare 2 validation sample set. (A) Scatter plots of the concentrations of hydroxylated polyunsaturated ultra long chain fatty acids (hPULCFAs) 446, 448 and 450 expressed as [13C1]-cholic acid equivalents in asymptomatic normal controls and pre-treatment colorectal cancer patients, (B) receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based upon the corresponding scatter plots in (A). Grey dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (C) Bar charts of the average concentration equivalents of hPULCFAs by disease stage. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. (D) ROC analysis by disease stage.
Figure 6Results of triple-quadrupole multiple reaction monitoring analysis of the Chiba validation sample set. (A) Scatter plots of the concentrations of hydroxylated polyunsaturated ultra long-chain fatty acids (hPULCFAs) 446, 448 and 450 expressed as [13C1]-cholic acid equivalents in asymptomatic normal controls, and pre-treatment colorectal cancer patients, (B) receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis based upon the corresponding scatter plots in (A). Grey dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence interval. (C) Bar charts of the average concentration equivalents of hPULCFAs by disease stage. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. (D) ROC analysis by disease stage.