Literature DB >> 20155423

Late complications of newborn circumcision: a common and avoidable problem.

Rafael V Pieretti1, Allan M Goldstein, Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to study the types of operative and post-operative late complications resulting from newborn circumcisions and to make recommendations to prevent them.
METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective review of the late complications resulting from newborn circumcisions treated at the MassGeneral Hospital for Children from January 2003 to December 2007 was undertaken. The source used was the consultation notes and operative reports of affected patients. Additionally, cases seen in the outpatient Pediatric Urology Clinic from April 2007 to April 2008 were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 8,967 children were operated during the study period, of which 424 (4.7%) were for complications resulting from previous neonatal circumcision. Penile adhesions, skin bridges, meatal stenosis, redundant foreskin (incomplete circumcision with uncircumcised appearance), recurrent phimosis, buried penis and penile rotation were the most frequent complications. At the outpatient clinic of the Section of Pediatric Urology, 127 boys with concerns following newborn circumcision were evaluated, representing 7.4% of the total volume of cases seen in this clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the need to undertake a collaborative study to define the incidence of complications following newborn circumcisions, which should be performed by practitioners with adequate training in the technique of their choice and its post-operative care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155423     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-010-2566-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  20 in total

1.  Neonatal circumcision: a ten-year overview: with comparison of the Gomco clamp and the Plastibell device.

Authors:  W F Gee; J S Ansell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Partial amputation of glans penis during Mogen clamp circumcision.

Authors:  B S Strimling
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Pediatric office procedures.

Authors:  D L Clair; A A Caldamone
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Circumcision--a continuing enigma.

Authors:  I O Leitch
Journal:  Aust Paediatr J       Date:  1970-03

5.  Amputation of penis after circumcision--penoplasty using expandable prosthesis.

Authors:  G Audry; J Buis; M P Vazquez; M Gruner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.191

6.  Two serious complications of circumcision. Case report.

Authors:  M Cetinkaya; H S Sağlam; S Beyribey
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1993

7.  Complications of circumcision.

Authors:  G W Kaplan
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.241

8.  Iatrogenic microphallus secondary to circumcision.

Authors:  S B Levitt; R B Smith; A G Ship
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  L E Ponsky; J H Ross; N Knipper; R Kay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Complications of circumcision.

Authors:  N Williams; L Kapila
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Phimosis].

Authors:  I Rübben; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Teaching neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  Peter Metcalfe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Simpson; Jean Carstensen; Patrick Murphy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Trends in revision circumcision at pediatric hospitals.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jonathan C Routh; Katherine Hubert; Dionne A Graham; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 6.  [Circumcision and orchiopexy: management of complications].

Authors:  M Promm; W H Rösch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Charbel El Bcheraoui; Xinjian Zhang; Christopher S Cooper; Charles E Rose; Peter H Kilmarx; Robert T Chen
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 8.  Complications of circumcision.

Authors:  Aaron J Krill; Lane S Palmer; Jeffrey S Palmer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2011-12-26

9.  Safety of over twelve hundred infant male circumcisions using the Mogen clamp in Kenya.

Authors:  Marisa R Young; Robert C Bailey; Elijah Odoyo-June; Tracy E Irwin; Walter Obiero; Dedan O Ongong'a; Jacinta A Badia; Kawango Agot; Sherry K Nordstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Severe forms of concealed penis without hypospadias: Surgical strategies.

Authors:  Lisieux Eyer de Jesus; Samuel Dekermacher; Kleber M Anderson
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.