Literature DB >> 10893633

Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision.

L E Ponsky1, J H Ross, N Knipper, R Kay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The appropriate management of penile adhesions in circumcised boys is unclear. An important consideration is whether adhesions resolve spontaneously. We studied the incidence of penile adhesions as a function of patient age to assess the natural history.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated all circumcised boys presenting to our pediatric urology clinic. A standard form was used to classify adhesions as grade 0-no adhesions, 1-fine adhesions to the corona, 2-adhesions covering less than 50% of the glans and 3-adhesions covering greater than 50% of the glans. All boys were evaluated by 1 of 2 pediatric urologists. Previous treatment of adhesions was assessed and skin bridges were also noted.
RESULTS: We enrolled in our study 254 boys 1 month to 19 years 8 months old. Only 7 patients had a history of treatment of adhesion, of whom 3 had recurrent adhesions at evaluation. Patients were divided into groups based on age, including younger than 12 months (61), 13 to 60 (78), 61 to 108 (51) and 109 months old or older (64). In these groups we noted an adhesion rate of 71%, 28%, 8% and 2%, respectively. The rate of adhesions more severe than grade 1 was 30%, 10% and 0% in boys 12 months old or younger, 13 to 60 and 61 months old or older, respectively. The oldest patient with grade 3 adhesions was 31 months old. Skin bridges in 6 cases involved the circumcision line in 4.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile adhesions develop after circumcision and the incidence decreases with patient age. Although there is debate on whether to lyse these adhesions manually, our findings suggest that adhesions resolve without treatment. Based on our results we do not recommend lysing penile adhesions, except perhaps those involving the circumcision line.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Newborn male circumcision.

Authors:  S Todd Sorokan; Jane C Finlay; Ann L Jefferies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Complications of circumcision performed within and outside the hospital.

Authors:  M K Atikeler; I Geçit; V Yüzgeç; O Yalçin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Neonatal circumcision: new recommendations & implications for practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Simpson; Jean Carstensen; Patrick Murphy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation.

Authors:  Dawn K Smith; Allan Taylor; Peter H Kilmarx; Patrick Sullivan; Lee Warner; Mary Kamb; Naomi Bock; Bos Kohmescher; Timothy D Mastro
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Late complications of newborn circumcision: a common and avoidable problem.

Authors:  Rafael V Pieretti; Allan M Goldstein; Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 1.827

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.