Literature DB >> 20155404

Developing a framework for assessing responsible conduct of research education programs.

Lynne E Olson1.   

Abstract

Education in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) in the United States has evolved over the past decade from targeting trainees to including educational efforts aimed at faculty and staff. In addition RCR education has become more focused as federal agencies have moved to recommend specific content and to mandate education in certain areas. RCR education has therefore become a research-compliance issue necessitating the development of policies and the commitment of resources to develop or expand systems for educating faculty and staff and for assuring compliance. These changes implied the need to develop a program evaluation model that could be applied to institutional RCR education programs, which were expected to differ from traditional academic credit-bearing courses targeting trainees. Information gleaned from the examination of corporate compliance models was analyzed in order to create a program evaluation module that could be used to document and assess educational programs focused on teaching RCR. A programmed series of questions for each of the nine RCR content areas identified by the United States Office of Research Integrity was created based on a performance-monitoring evaluation model. The questions focus on educational goals, resources provided to support the educational efforts, educational content, content delivery, educational outcomes, compliance requirements and feedback. Answers collected in response to the questions could be used to both document and continually improve the quality of RCR educational programs through on-going formative assessment and feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20155404     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9196-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  6 in total

1.  Creating effective research compliance programs in academic institutions.

Authors:  G Grant; O Guyton; R Forrester
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Designing an outcome-based ethics curriculum for professional education: strategies and evidence of effectiveness.

Authors:  Muriel J Bebeau
Journal:  J Moral Educ       Date:  1993

3.  Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.

Authors:  Sarah Brown; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  A C Mastroianni; J P Kahn
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  G A Sachs; M Siegler
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; S J Thoma
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool.

Authors:  Arja Halkoaho; Mari Matveinen; Ville Leinonen; Kirsi Luoto; Tapani Keränen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Professional Decision-Making in Research (PDR): The Validity of a New Measure.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; Raymond C Tait; Jillon S Vander Wal; Kari A Baldwin; Alison L Antes; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Compliance Disengagement in Research: Development and Validation of a New Measure.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; John Gibbs
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Recommendations for Effective Integration of Ethics and Responsible Conduct of Research (E/RCR) Education into Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report.

Authors:  Laura A Diaz-Martinez; Ginger R Fisher; David Esparza; Jay M Bhatt; Christina E D'Arcy; Jennifer Apodaca; Sara Brownell; Lisa Corwin; William B Davis; Kevin W Floyd; Patrick J Killion; Jaclyn Madden; Patricia Marsteller; Teresa Mayfield-Meyer; Kelly K McDonald; Martina Rosenberg; Mark A Yarborough; Jeffrey T Olimpo
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.