Literature DB >> 28406810

New Developments in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery.

Katherine Ikard Stewart1, Amanda N Fader.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery continues to transform the field of gynecologic oncology and has now become the standard of care for many early-stage malignancies. The proven benefits of minimally invasive surgery are driving the rapid introduction and dissemination of novel technologies and the increasing ability to perform even the most complex procedures less invasively. In this article, we will review the current literature on traditional multiport laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery as well as robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, with a specific focus on their role in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28406810      PMCID: PMC5576030          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  77 in total

1.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Antonella Cromi; Stefano Uccella; Valentino Bergamini; Silvia Tomera; Massimo Franchi; Pierfrancesco Bolis
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Laparoscopic sterilization. Review of 3600 cases.

Authors:  C R Wheeless; B H Thompson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Kenneth H Kim; Shannon A Bryant; Bin Zhang; Christa Sikes; Kristopher J Kimball; Larry C Kilgore; Warner K Huh; John M Straughn; Ronald D Alvarez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Ann D Fisher; Maha Al-Khaduri; Fiona Kew; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

5.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; Abigail S Charles; Jin Hee Kim; Noah Goldman; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christian Hoyer-Sørensen; Ingvild Vistad; Karen Ballard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?

Authors:  Paola A Gehrig; Leigh A Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Lisa N Abaid; Alberto Mendivil; John F Boggess
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.

Authors:  Stacey A Scheib; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Laparoscopic management of early ovarian and fallopian tube cancers: surgical and survival outcome.

Authors:  Farr R Nezhat; Mohammad Ezzati; Linus Chuang; Alireza A Shamshirsaz; Jamal Rahaman; Herb Gretz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Ricardo dos Reis; Charlotte C Sun; Michael R Milam; Michael W Bevers; Jubilee Brown; Brian M Slomovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Federico Migliorelli; Marie Voglimacci; Justine Figurelli; Stephanie Motton; Yann Tanguy Le Gac; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 2.  Port-Site Metastasis in Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Kelly Benabou; Wafa Khadraoui; Tarek Khader; Pei Hui; Rodrigo Fernandez; Masoud Azodi; Gulden Menderes
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mengting Zhang; Wei Dai; Yuexiu Si; Yetan Shi; Xiangyuan Li; Ke Jiang; Jingyi Shen; Liying Ying
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training Is Equally Effective Using 2D Compared to 3D Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eliana Montanari; Richard Schwameis; Nikolaus Veit-Rubin; Lorenz Kuessel; Heinrich Husslein
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Stage III uterine serous carcinoma: modern trends in multimodality treatment.

Authors:  Jessie Y Li; Melissa R Young; Gloria Huang; Babak Litkouhi; Alessandro Santin; Peter E Schwartz; Shari Damast
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.