Literature DB >> 20152602

Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices.

Tanja M Rabsilber1, Charlotte Jepsen, Gerd U Auffarth, Mike P Holzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using a new optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer and compare the results with those obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) optical biometer.
SETTING: International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
METHODS: Biometry measurements in eyes of cataract patients were performed by the same examiner with an OLCR biometer (Lenstar LS 900/Allegro Biograph) and a PCI optical biometer (IOLMaster). After determination of axial length (AL), corneal radii values by keratometry (R1 and R2), and anterior chamber depth (ACD), power calculation for an AcrySof MA60AC IOL was compared between the 2 devices using 4 formulas and the corresponding IOL constants. The target was emmetropia.
RESULTS: One hundred eyes of 100 cataract patients (mean age 70.0 years +/- 10.6 [SD]) were measured. Of the biometry parameters, the only statistically significant differences between the 2 devices were in R2 (mean difference 0.02 +/- 0.05 mm), (R1 + R2)/2 (mean difference 0.01 +/- 0.04 mm), and ACD (mean difference 0.05 +/- 0.11 mm) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). The mean differences in IOL power calculations using the 4 formulas were not statistically significant between the 2 devices (P>.01, Wilcoxon test).
CONCLUSION: The OLCR biometry device provided precise and valid measurements and thus can be used for the preoperative examination of cataract patients. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152602     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  [Comparison of IOL-Master 500 vs. Lenstar LS900 concerning the calculation of target refraction: A retrospective analysis].

Authors:  M Stattin; C Zehetner; N E Bechrakis; L Speicher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Precision of 5 different keratometry devices.

Authors:  Jonas Vejvad Nørskov Laursen; Peter Jeppesen; Thomas Olsen
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer.

Authors:  Leyla Asena; Sirel Gür Güngör; Ahmet Akman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  [Precision of a new device for biometric measurements in pseudophakic eyes].

Authors:  A L Hildebrandt; G U Auffarth; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial lengths of myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic children.

Authors:  Mehmethan Dogan; Ufuk Elgin; Emine Sen; Kemal Tekin; Pelin Yilmazbas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Clinically relevant biometry.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  In vivo measurement of the average refractive index of the human crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Carolina de Freitas; Marco Ruggeri; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in Eyes with Cataract.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Qinmei Wang; Konrad Pesudovs; Xin Yang; Fangjun Bao; Ayong Yu; Shishi Lin; Yifan Feng; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.