Literature DB >> 20152200

Surgical vacuum drains: types, uses, and complications.

Rajaraman Durai1, Philip C H Ng.   

Abstract

High- and low-pressure vacuum drains are commonly used after surgical procedures. High-pressure vacuum drains (ie, sealed, closed-circuit systems) are efficient and allow for easy monitoring and safe disposal of the drainage. Low-pressure vacuum drains use gentle pressure to evacuate excess fluid and air, and are easy for patients to manage at home because it is easy to reinstate the vacuum pressure. Perioperative nurses should be able to identify the various types of commonly used drains and their surgical applications. Nurses should know how to care for drains, how to reinstate the vacuum pressure when necessary, and the potential complications that could result from surgical drain use. Copyright 2010 AORN, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152200     DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AORN J        ISSN: 0001-2092            Impact factor:   0.676


  15 in total

1.  Factors affecting the safety of drains and catheters in surgical patients.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yılmaz; Melih Akıncı; Duray Şeker; Müjdat Güller; Gürkan Güneri; Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 2.  The current state of the evidence for the use of drains in spinal surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Salil B Patel; William Griffiths-Jones; Conor S Jones; Dino Samartzis; Andrew J Clarke; Shahid Khan; Oliver M Stokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How Much Blood Could a JP Suck If a JP Could Suck Blood?

Authors:  Erin M Mamuyac; Andrew K Pappa; Brian D Thorp; Charles S Ebert; Brent A Senior; Adam M Zanation; Feng-Chang Lin; Adam J Kimple
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  A comparison of the use and non-use of closed suction wound drainage in open reduction and internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Obiora N Muoghalu; Gabriel O Eyichukwu; Emmanuel Iyidobi; Udo E Anyaehie; Kenechi A Madu; Ikechukwu C Okwesili
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A Randomized Controlled Study of Quilting with Axillary Lymphatic Ligation Versus Conventional Modified Radical Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar V; Narendra Hulikal; Manilal Banoth
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14

6.  Surgical drain induced subgaleal hematomas and skin necrosis in pediatrics: a case report.

Authors:  Gigih Aditya Wardana; Wihasto Suryaningtyas; Muhammad Arifin Parenrengi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 1.532

7.  Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Amanda R Sergesketter; Ronnie L Shammas; Sohrab Vatsia; Victoria D Vuong; Syed Khalid; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  The Global Prevalence of Seroma After Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader Salari; Behnaz Fatahi; Yalda Bartina; Mohsen Kazeminia; Mohammadbagher Heydari; Masoud Mohammadi; Mahvan Hemmati; Shamarina Shohaimi
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial Assessing a Novel Lysine-Derived Urethane Adhesive in a Large Flap Surgical Procedure without Drains.

Authors:  Joseph P Hunstad; Joseph Michaels; A Jay Burns; Sheri Slezak; W Grant Stevens; Dottie M Clower; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Minimally invasive video-assisted versus minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Zdeněk Fík; Jaromír Astl; Michal Zábrodský; Petr Lukeš; Ilja Merunka; Jan Betka; Martin Chovanec
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.