Literature DB >> 30069510

Post-operative drain use in patients undergoing decompression and fusion: incidence of complications and symptomatic hematoma.

Owoicho Adogwa1, Aladine A Elsamadicy2,3, Amanda R Sergesketter2, Ronnie L Shammas2, Sohrab Vatsia2, Victoria D Vuong1, Syed Khalid1, Joseph Cheng4, Carlos A Bagley5, Isaac O Karikari2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical drains are commonly used after spine surgery to minimize infection and hematoma formation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of post-operative complications after spinal decompression and fusion with and without a subfascial drain.
METHODS: The medical records of 139 adult (≥18 years old) spinal deformity patients undergoing elective spinal decompression and fusion at a major academic institution were reviewed. We identified 116 (83.5%) who had a post-operative drain and 23 (16.5%) who did not have a postoperative drain (No-Drain: n=23; Drain-Use: n=116). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intra- and post-operative complication rates were collected for each patient. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of post-operative complications, specifically surgical site infections (SSI) and hematoma formation.
RESULTS: Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both cohorts, with the body mass index (BMI) slightly higher in the Drain-Use cohort (No-Drain: 26.1 kg/m2vs. Drain-Use: 29.1 kg/m2, P=0.02). Operative time and the median number of levels fused were similar between the cohorts. The postoperative complications profile was similar between both cohorts, including deep and superficial SSIs (P=0.52 and P=0.66, respectively), and incidence of hematoma formation (P=0.66). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly higher for the Drain-use cohort compared to the No-Drain cohort (5.0 vs. 2.8 days, P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the 30-day hospital readmission rate or incidence of 30-day wound dehiscence, draining wound, incision & drainage (I & D), or bleeding between both patient groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of postoperative subfascial drains in patients undergoing spinal decompression with fusion may not be associated with a reduction in SSIs or hematoma formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thoracolumbar; hematoma; infections; post-operative drains; subfascial drains; surgical site infection (SSI)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30069510      PMCID: PMC6046317          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  39 in total

Review 1.  The current state of the evidence for the use of drains in spinal surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Salil B Patel; William Griffiths-Jones; Conor S Jones; Dino Samartzis; Andrew J Clarke; Shahid Khan; Oliver M Stokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  On the use of drains in orthopedic and trauma.

Authors:  Y Z Lawal; M O Ogirima; I L Dahiru; K Abubakar; A Ajibade
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Y H Kim; S H Cho; R S Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Is closed-suction drainage necessary for single-level lumbar decompression?: review of 560 cases.

Authors:  Masahiro Kanayama; Fumihiro Oha; Daisuke Togawa; Keiichi Shigenobu; Tomoyuki Hashimoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The Use of Closed Suction Drainage in Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Is It Really Necessary?

Authors:  Jia-Ming Liu; Wen-Zhao Chen; Bi-Qi Fu; Jiang-Wei Chen; Zhi-Li Liu; Shan-Hu Huang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  The effect of closed-suction drains on the incidence of local wound complications following tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Babak J Mehrara; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematomas.

Authors:  Juan Uribe; Kapil Moza; Omar Jimenez; Barth Green; Allan D O Levi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Effectiveness of postoperative wound drains in one- and two-level cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  Caroline E Poorman; Peter G Passias; Kristina M Bianco; Anthony Boniello; Sun Yang; Michael C Gerling
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 9.  The Outcome of Using Closed Suction Wound Drains in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Feras Waly; Mohammad M Alzahrani; Fahad H Abduljabbar; Tara Landry; Jean Ouellet; Kathryn Moran; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-12

10.  Effect of Using Local Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Addition to Intravenous Antibiotics in Posterior Lumbar Surgery: Midterm Result in a Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Gun-Ill Lee; Koang Hum Bak; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Kyu-Sun Choi
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-06-30
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of postoperative symptomatic spinal epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Chen; Xiaoxin Zhong; Wenzhou Liu; Chipiu Wong; Qing He; Yantao Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 2.  Drains in Spine Surgery for Degenerative Disc Diseases: A Literature Review to Determine Its Usage.

Authors:  Louis Reier; James B Fowler; Mohammad Arshad; Javed Siddiqi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-13

3.  Drainage after posterior single-level instrumented lumbar fusion: Natural pressure vs negative pressure.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Hengrui Chang; Kaiyu Liu; Mingxin Shi; Chengjie Song; Xianzhong Meng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.