Literature DB >> 20148326

Muscle torque in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches.

Chih-Hung Chang1, Rong-Sen Yang, Kuang-Ho Chen, Tang-Kue Liu, Wen-Chih Chen, Yi-Ching Ho, Sheng-Mou Hou.   

Abstract

The subvastus and midvastus approaches are two of the most commonly performed quadriceps preserving approaches for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can hasten functional recovery and rehabilitation. However, there has not been sufficient investigation with respect to a quantitative comparison between the two approaches in terms of muscle strength. To compare outcomes with respect to muscle strength between these two approaches, quadriceps and hamstring muscle torques of 20 patients who underwent primary TKA with the subvastus (SV) approach and 10 patients who received the midvastus (MV) approach were measured after surgery. The median age of patients in the SV group (68 years, range 53-77 years) was significantly different that the median age of patients in the MV group (61 years, range 50-73 years) (P = 0.0141). There was no significant difference in patient weight, height, or postoperative duration before muscle testing between the SV and MV groups. There were no significant differences in peak muscle torque or hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio between the groups. We thus conclude peak muscle torque and H/Q ratios were not statistically different with the SV or MV approach, therefore functional outcome is comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148326     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1066-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  19 in total

1.  Functional outcomes after endoprosthetic knee reconstruction following resection of osteosarcoma near the knee.

Authors:  Jau-Yih Tsauo; Wei-Chun Li; Rong-Sen Yang
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Evaluation of complications associated with six hundred mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  William C Schroer; Paul J Diesfeld; Mary E Reedy; Angela R LeMarr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Counterpoint: the interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle.

Authors:  A de Haan; K H L Gerrits; C J de Ruiter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-07

4.  Point: the interpolated twitch does/does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-09-18

5.  Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approaches.

Authors:  Alexander Berth; Dietmar Urbach; Wolfram Neumann; Friedemann Awiszus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach.

Authors:  Steven B Haas; Mary Ann Manitta; Paul Burdick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation.

Authors:  P Weinrauch; N Myers; M Wilkinson; J Dodsworth; P Fitzpatrick; S Whitehouse
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.118

9.  Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William C Schroer; Paul J Diesfeld; Mary E Reedy; Angela R LeMarr
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Peter M Bonutti; Slif D Ulrich; Tobias Fatscher; David R Marker; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  6 in total

1.  Faster quadriceps recovery with the far medial subvastus approach in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A comparison between subvastus and midvastus approaches for staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty:a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  T Masjudin; Zh Kamari
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-11

Review 3.  Minimally invasive versus conventional approaches in total knee replacement/arthroplasty: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Themistoklis Tzatzairis; Aliki Fiska; Athanasios Ververidis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty with the subvastus approach allows rapid rehabilitation: a prospective, biomechanical and observational study.

Authors:  Tsung-Ching Lin; Hsing-Kuo Wang; Jia-Wine Chen; Cheng-Ming Chiu; Hsiu-Ling Chou; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-06-29

Review 5.  Minimally invasive midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  San-Zhong Xu; Xiang-Jin Lin; Xiang Tong; Xuan-Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Angela Deakin; Navin Balasubramanian; Alberto Gregori
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.