Literature DB >> 29881177

Minimally invasive versus conventional approaches in total knee replacement/arthroplasty: A review of the literature.

Themistoklis Tzatzairis1, Aliki Fiska2, Athanasios Ververidis1, Konstantinos Tilkeridis1, Konstantinos Kazakos1, Georgios I Drosos1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy lengthening and aging of population resulted in dramatically increase of patients with osteoarthritis. Total knee arthroplasty is widely used as the gold standard in order to relieve pain, correct deformity and restore function. A contemporary and controversial topic, is that of minimally invasive surgery for TKA. The minimally invasive approaches are based on the concept that they don't violate the extensor mechanism, resulting in earlier functional recovery, shorter hospital stay and enhanced patients' overall satisfaction. The most commonly used MIS approaches in TKA are the subvastus, midvastus and the quadriceps sparing. There is a debate regarding the efficacy and safety of these methods.
OBJECTIVE: In this article we will review the current literature (randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses) on MIS compared to traditional approach and analyse their clinical safety, efficacy and long-term results.
DESIGN: Comparison of well-designed studies have tried to demonstrate the advantages/disadvantages, the clinical results and the complications of the MIS approaches compared to the MPP approach.
RESULTS: MIS approaches seem to provide advantages in the immediate post-operative period accompanied by increased reports of complications. Consequently, further investigation based on large well-designed studies with long-term results are warranted to further clarify MIS effectiveness/safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medial parapaterllar; Midvastus; Minimally invasive; Quadriceps sparing; Subvastus; Total knee arthroplasy

Year:  2018        PMID: 29881177      PMCID: PMC5990225          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  77 in total

1.  Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial.

Authors:  G S Roysam; M J Oakley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Sample size calculation and power analysis: a quick review.

Authors:  Karen Fitzner; Elizabeth Heckinger
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.140

3.  Mini-midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bryan J Nestor; Charles E Toulson; Sherry I Backus; Stephen L Lyman; Kristin L Foote; Russell E Windsor
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Comparing outcomes of medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael G Bourke; Gwendolen A Jull; Peter J Buttrum; Prudence L Fitzpatrick; Philip A Dalton; Trevor G Russell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years.

Authors:  A F Chen; R K Alan; D E Redziniak; A J Tria
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

6.  Evaluation of complications associated with six hundred mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  William C Schroer; Paul J Diesfeld; Mary E Reedy; Angela R LeMarr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Complications after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty as compared with traditional incision techniques: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Holly Smith; Kelly A Lefaivre; J Rod Davey; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Matsueda; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Implementation of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the public health system: a comparative cost analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Sascha Karunaratne; Kate McBride; Sanjeev Gupta; Mark Horsley; Brett Fritsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  First Reported Series of Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Middle East.

Authors:  Muthana M Sartawi; Hafizur Rahman; James M Kohlmann; Brett R Levine
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 3.  Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Different Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Long Zhao; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jian-Ke Pan; Gui-Hong Liang; He-Tao Huang; Wei-Yi Yang; Ming-Hui Luo; Jun Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Patellar retraction versus eversion on functional outcomes in total knee replacement: a randomized controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Yong Ji; Yan-Xiao Cheng; Hongwei Bao; Jingzhao Hou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.