Literature DB >> 16598087

Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation.

P Weinrauch1, N Myers, M Wilkinson, J Dodsworth, P Fitzpatrick, S Whitehouse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or standard instrumentation TKA using a medial parapatellar or subvastus approach.
METHODS: A prospective controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with a low contact stress rotating platform prosthesis was conducted. Patients were randomised to receive surgery with either computer navigation or standard instrumentation. A medial parapatellar or subvastus approach was used according to the surgeons' preference. Outcome measures included preoperative knee function, intra-operative factors, and postoperative rehabilitation.
RESULTS: Duration of surgery was significantly longer when using computer navigation; however, operating time decreased with greater experience. A higher incidence and duration of early postoperative quadriceps dysfunction was associated with computer-assisted TKA through the medial parapatellar approach than through the subvastus approach or TKA performed with standard instrumentation. No patient who received surgery through the subvastus approach had a lag of more than 20 degrees, at 48 hours postoperatively, regardless of the instrumentation used.
CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted TKA through a medial parapatellar approach was associated with delayed recovery of the quadriceps during early postoperative rehabilitation. This was due to the additional quadriceps dissection required to place the femoral tracking array. The subvastus approach is therefore recommended for computer-assisted TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598087     DOI: 10.1177/230949900601400111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  6 in total

Review 1.  Navigation knee replacement.

Authors:  Rupen Dattani; Surendra Patnaik; Avadhoot Kantak; Georgis Tselentakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Muscle torque in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang; Rong-Sen Yang; Kuang-Ho Chen; Tang-Kue Liu; Wen-Chih Chen; Yi-Ching Ho; Sheng-Mou Hou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A comparison between subvastus and midvastus approaches for staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty:a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  T Masjudin; Zh Kamari
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-11

4.  Total knee arthroplasty: better short-term results after subvastus approach: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Sergi Sastre; Maria-Dolors Sanchez; Lluis Lozano; Felip Orient; Fidel Fontg; Montserrat Nuñez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable.

Authors:  Wouter L W van Hemert; Rachel Senden; Bernd Grimm; Matthijs J A van der Linde; Arno Lataster; Ide C Heyligers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Medial subvastus versus the medial parapatellar approach for total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  James R Berstock; James R Murray; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom; Andrew D Beswick
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-03-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.