Literature DB >> 2014720

Leg-length discrepancy measured by ultrasonography.

T Terjesen1, P Benum, I Rossvoll, S Svenningsen, A E Fløystad Isern, T Nordbø.   

Abstract

Leg-length discrepancy was determined by real-time ultrasonography (ultrasound) in 45 patients, and the measurements were compared with those of erect-posture radiography. A special device for holding and moving the ultrasound transducer was constructed, and the leg length was measured as the highest level of the femoral head in the standing position. The correlation coefficient r between ultrasound and radiography was 0.94, the mean difference was -1.9 mm, and the limits of agreement (mean +/- 2 SD) were -9.1 to 5.3 mm. The mean difference between examiners 1 and 2 was 1.7 mm, and the 95 percent confidence interval was +/- 7 mm. We conclude that leg-length discrepancy can be reliably determined by ultrasound, although the accuracy is less than that obtained by radiographic methods. Because ultrasound is not limited by radiation hazards, our technique can be used for clinical screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2014720     DOI: 10.3109/17453679108999237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  10 in total

1.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Leg length inequality. Implications for running injury prevention.

Authors:  S T McCaw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The effect on low back pain of shortening osteotomy for leg length inequality.

Authors:  I Rossvoll; S Junk; T Terjesen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Three-dimensional measurements of the lower extremity in children and adolescents using a low-dose biplanar X-ray device.

Authors:  Ramon Gheno; Eric Nectoux; Bernard Herbaux; Matteo Baldisserotto; Luiz Glock; Anne Cotten; Nathalie Boutry
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Upright MRI measurement of mechanical axis and frontal plane alignment as a new technique: a comparative study with weight bearing full length radiographs.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Iosifina Doxastaki; Christian Krettek; Carl Haasper; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Comparison of Lower Extremity Length and Angle between Computed Radiography-Based Teleoroentgenogram and EOS® Imaging System.

Authors:  Kwang-Rak Park; Jae-Ho Lee; Dae-Soo Kim; Ho Ryu; Jaeho Kim; Chang-Jin Yon; Si-Wook Lee
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

8.  Leg-length discrepancy is associated with low back pain among those who must stand while working.

Authors:  Satu Rannisto; Annaleena Okuloff; Jukka Uitti; Markus Paananen; Pasi-Heikki Rannisto; Antti Malmivaara; Jaro Karppinen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Reliability of an Integrated Ultrasound and Stereophotogrammetric System for Lower Limb Anatomical Characterisation.

Authors:  Frederick Greatrex; Erica Montefiori; Thomas Grupp; Josef Kozak; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.781

10.  An MRI-based technique for assessment of lower extremity deformities-reproducibility, accuracy, and clinical application.

Authors:  Stefan Hinterwimmer; Heiko Graichen; Thomas J Vogl; Nasreddin Abolmaali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 7.034

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.