Literature DB >> 20146614

Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.

Nathan A Parks1, Matthew R Hilimire, Paul M Corballis.   

Abstract

The perceptual load theory of attention posits that attentional selection occurs early in processing when a task is perceptually demanding but occurs late in processing otherwise. We used a frequency-tagged steady-state evoked potential paradigm to investigate the modality specificity of perceptual load-induced distractor filtering and the nature of neural-competitive interactions between task and distractor stimuli. EEG data were recorded while participants monitored a stream of stimuli occurring in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) for the appearance of previously assigned targets. Perceptual load was manipulated by assigning targets that were identifiable by color alone (low load) or by the conjunction of color and orientation (high load). The RSVP task was performed alone and in the presence of task-irrelevant visual and auditory distractors. The RSVP stimuli, visual distractors, and auditory distractors were "tagged" by modulating each at a unique frequency (2.5, 8.5, and 40.0 Hz, respectively), which allowed each to be analyzed separately in the frequency domain. We report three important findings regarding the neural mechanisms of perceptual load. First, we replicated previous findings of within-modality distractor filtering and demonstrated a reduction in visual distractor signals with high perceptual load. Second, auditory steady-state distractor signals were unaffected by manipulations of visual perceptual load, consistent with the idea that perceptual load-induced distractor filtering is modality specific. Third, analysis of task-related signals revealed that visual distractors competed with task stimuli for representation and that increased perceptual load appeared to resolve this competition in favor of the task stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146614     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Michelle G Hall; Hayley F Lye; Martin V Sale; Laura R Fenlon; Timothy J Carroll; Stephan Riek; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Bo Hong; Shangkai Gao; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.

Authors:  Katharine Molloy; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10

8.  Enhancement and suppression in the visual field under perceptual load.

Authors:  Nathan A Parks; Diane M Beck; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

9.  Load-induced inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Dana Raveh; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The influence of visuospatial attention on unattended auditory 40 Hz responses.

Authors:  Cullen Roth; Cota Navin Gupta; Sergey M Plis; Eswar Damaraju; Siddharth Khullar; Vince D Calhoun; David A Bridwell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.