Literature DB >> 20144413

Glucose clamp algorithms and insulin time-action profiles.

B Wayne Bequette1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Most current insulin pumps include an insulin-on-board (IOB) feature to help subjects avoid problems associated with "insulin stacking." In addition, many control algorithms proposed for a closed-loop artificial pancreas make use of IOB to reduce the probability of hypoglycemic events that often occur due to the integral action of the controller. The IOB curves are generated from the pharmacodynamic (time-activity profiles) actions of subcutaneous insulin, which are obtained from glycemic clamp studies.
METHODS: Glycemic clamp algorithms are reviewed and in silico studies are performed to analyze the effect of glucose meter bias and noise on glycemic control and the manipulated glucose infusion rates. The glucose infusion rates are used to obtain insulin time-activity profiles, which are then used to generate IOB curves.
RESULTS: A model-based, three-step-ahead controller is shown to be equivalent to a proportional-integral control algorithm with time-delay compensation. A systematic glucose meter bias of +6 mg/dl results in a decrease in the glucose area under the curve of 3% but no change in the IOB profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary simulation studies, a substantial amount of glucose meter bias and noise during a glycemic clamp can be tolerated with little net effect on the IOB curves. It is suggested that handheld glucose meters can therefore be used in clamp studies if the measurements are filtered (averaged) before processing by the control algorithm. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144413      PMCID: PMC2769898          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  23 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling research to support the development of automated insulin-delivery systems.

Authors:  Garry M Steil; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

2.  A new glucose-clamp algorithm--theoretical considerations and computer simulations.

Authors:  P Palazzo; V Viti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Development and testing of a simple algorithm for a glucose clamp.

Authors:  S M Furler; G S Zelenka; E W Kraegen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Insulin aspart (B28 asp-insulin): a fast-acting analog of human insulin: absorption kinetics and action profile compared with regular human insulin in healthy nondiabetic subjects.

Authors:  S R Mudaliar; F A Lindberg; M Joyce; P Beerdsen; P Strange; A Lin; R R Henry
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  A comparison of the artificial pancreas (glucose controlled insulin infusion system) and a manual technique for assessing insulin sensitivity during euglycaemic clamping.

Authors:  M Ponchner; R J Heine; A Pernet; I Hanning; A J Francis; D Cook; H Orskov; K G Alberti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Feedback control dynamics for glucose controlled insulin infusion system.

Authors:  A H Clemens
Journal:  Med Prog Technol       Date:  1979-06-15

7.  FreeStyle Mini blood glucose results are accurate and suitable for use in glycemic clamp protocols.

Authors:  Ohad Cohen; Sigal Shaklai; Ephraim Gabis; Michael A Pani
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09

8.  The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of different formulations of biphasic insulin aspart: a randomized, glucose clamp, crossover study.

Authors:  T Heise; U Eckers; K Kanc; J N Nielsen; L Nosek
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Insulin glulisine: a faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro.

Authors:  T Heise; L Nosek; H Spitzer; L Heinemann; E Niemöller; A D Frick; R H A Becker
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Development of the Biostator Glucose clamping algorithm.

Authors:  A H Clemens; D L Hough; P A D'Orazio
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  14 in total

1.  In silico evaluation of an artificial pancreas combining exogenous ultrafast-acting technosphere insulin with zone model predictive control.

Authors:  Justin J Lee; Eyal Dassau; Howard Zisser; Rebecca A Harvey; Lois Jovanovič; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

2.  Progress in development of an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Claudio Cobelli; Boris Kovatchev; Howard C Zisser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 3.  Use of Automated Bolus Calculators for Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Frank L Schwartz; Cynthia R Marling
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-23

4.  Quantification of the glycemic response to microdoses of subcutaneous glucagon at varying insulin levels.

Authors:  Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Parkash A Bakhtiani; Ahmad Haidar; Deborah L Branigan; Matthew Breen; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?

Authors:  William T Riley; Daniel E Rivera; Audie A Atienza; Wendy Nilsen; Susannah M Allison; Robin Mermelstein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Challenges and Recent Progress in the Development of a Closed-loop Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  Annu Rev Control       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.091

7.  A personalized and control systems engineering conceptual approach to target childhood anxiety in the contexts of cultural diversity.

Authors:  Armando A Pina; Lindsay E Holly; Argero A Zerr; Daniel E Rivera
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2014-04-04

8.  Precision and accuracy of hyperglycemic clamps in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kieren J Mather; Ashley H Tjaden; Adam Hoehn; Kristen J Nadeau; Thomas A Buchanan; Steven E Kahn; Silva A Arslanian; Sonia Caprio; Karen M Atkinson; Melanie Cree-Green; Kristina M Utzschneider; Sharon L Edelstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.310

9.  Separating insulin-mediated and non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake during and after aerobic exercise in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Thanh-Tin P Nguyen; Peter G Jacobs; Jessica R Castle; Leah M Wilson; Kerry Kuehl; Deborah Branigan; Virginia Gabo; Florian Guillot; Michael C Riddell; Ahmad Haidar; Joseph El Youssef
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 4.310

10.  Artificial neural networks based controller for glucose monitoring during clamp test.

Authors:  Merav Catalogna; Eyal Cohen; Sigal Fishman; Zamir Halpern; Uri Nevo; Eshel Ben-Jacob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.