Literature DB >> 20144278

Use of serial patient hemoglobin A1c differences to determine long-term imprecision of immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography analyzers.

David V Tran1, Andrew W Lyon, Trefor N Higgins, James C Wesenberg, Lisa Vandergouwe, Carmen L Wiley, George S Cembrowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The quality of the HbA1c assay is inversely proportional to the variation of the assay. Most published measures of HbA1c variation are limited by the data collection period, the statistical treatment of outliers, and even the noncommutability of the products used to generate the variation measurements. We have used an alternate approach to derive HbA1c variation, using serial patient data.
METHODS: HbA1c measurements of outpatient blood sample pairs drawn within 30 days of each other were made on three different immunoassay systems: the Roche INTEGRA 700, the Roche INTEGRA 400, and the Dade Dimension RxL; and two high-performance liquid chromatography assays: the Tosoh G7 and the Tosoh 2.2+. The standard deviation of duplicates was calculated for the following time intervals: 1 to 3 days, 4 to 6 days, 7 to 9 days,.., 28 to 30 days. These intra-individual variations were then plotted; extrapolation to time zero yields the long term total random error which consists of both analytic and pre-analytic error. Data collection periods were usually 2 years.
RESULTS: At the mean HbA1cs of 7.08%, 7.14%, 7.20%, 6.96%, and 7.51% for populations tested on the Roche INTEGRA 700, Roche INTEGRA 400, Dade Dimension RxL, Tosoh 2.2+, and Tosoh G7, respectively, the total analytic imprecisions (coefficient of variation) were 2.56%, 2.29%, 2.25%, 1.66%, and 1.14%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of the HbA1c long term total imprecisions shows that while the three immunoassay systems are acceptable, the Tosoh HbA1c analyzers demonstrate superior analytic performance. 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144278      PMCID: PMC2769869          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

Review 1.  Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes.

Authors:  W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Unique approach to derivation of random error in laboratory assays: application to glycohemoglobin testing demonstrates poor clinical performance for immunochemistry assay.

Authors:  David V Tran; Tammy L Hofer; Terrence Lee; George S Cembrowski
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Why commutability matters.

Authors:  W Greg Miller; Gary L Myers; Robert Rej
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Analytic bias among certified methods for the measurement of hemoglobin A1c: a cause for concern?

Authors:  Earle W Holmes; Cağatay Erşahin; Geri J Augustine; Gerald A Charnogursky; Margie Gryzbac; Joanne V Murrell; Kathleen M McKenna; Fadi Nabhan; Stephen E Kahn
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.

Authors:  P J Cornbleet; N Gochman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Intensive diabetes management requires very precise testing of glycohemoglobin.

Authors:  N S Kolatkar; G S Cembrowski; P L Callahan; D D Etzwiler
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; David E Bruns; David E Goldstein; Noel K Maclaren; Jay M McDonald; Marian Parrott
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 8.  Glycated hemoglobin standardization--National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) perspective.

Authors:  Randie R Little
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in hemoglobin A1c: is it the same in both hemispheres?

Authors:  Trefor Higgins; Sharon Saw; Ken Sikaris; Carmen L Wiley; George C Cembrowski; Andrew W Lyon; Annu Khajuria; David Tran
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

2.  The Glucose Measurement Industry and Hemoglobin A1c: An Opportunity for Creative Destruction.

Authors:  George Cembrowski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-18

3.  Association of pre-pregnancy BMI and postpartum weight retention with postpartum HbA1c among women with Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  T Huang; F M Brown; A Curran; T James-Todd
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Comparison of longitudinal point-of-care and high-performance liquid chromatography HbA1c measurements in a multi-centre trial.

Authors:  C R Alleyn; L M B Laffel; L K Volkening; B J Anderson; T R Nansel; T Wysocki; J Weissberg-Benchell
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.