Literature DB >> 20140035

NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.

Donald Steinwachs1, Jennifer Dacey Allen, William Eric Barlow, R Paul Duncan, Leonard E Egede, Lawrence S Friedman, Nancy L Keating, Paula Kim, Judith R Lave, Thomas A LaVeist, Roberta B Ness, Robert J Optican, Beth A Virnig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data on enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS: A non-DHHS, nonadvocate 13-member panel representing the fields of cancer surveillance, health services research, community-based research, informed decision-making, access to care, health care policy, health communication, health economics, health disparities, epidemiology, statistics, thoracic radiology, internal medicine, gastroenterology, public health, end-of-life care, and a public representative. In addition, 20 experts from pertinent fields presented data to the panel and conference audience. EVIDENCE: Presentations by experts and a systematic review of the literature prepared by the RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience. CONFERENCE PROCESS: The panel drafted its statement based on scientific evidence presented in open forum and on published scientific literature. The draft statement was presented on the final day of the conference and circulated to the audience for comment. The panel released a revised statement later that day at http://consensus.nih.gov. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.
CONCLUSIONS: The panel found that despite substantial progress toward higher colorectal cancer screening rates nationally, screening rates fall short of desirable levels. Targeted initiatives to improve screening rates and reduce disparities in underscreened communities and population subgroups could further reduce colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. This could be achieved by utilizing the full range of screening options and evidence-based interventions for increasing screening rates. With additional investments in quality monitoring, Americans could be assured that all screening achieves high rates of cancer prevention and early detection. To close the gap in screening, this report identifies the following priority areas for implementation and research to enhance the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening: • Eliminate financial barriers to colorectal cancer screening and appropriate follow up. • Widely implement interventions that have proven effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening, including patient reminder systems and one-on-one interactions with providers, educators, or navigators. • Conduct research to assess the effectiveness of tailoring programs to match the characteristics and preferences of target population groups to increase colorectal cancer screening. • Implement systems to ensure appropriate follow-up of positive colorectal cancer screening results. • Develop systems to assure high quality of colorectal cancer screening programs. • Conduct studies to determine the comparative effectiveness of the various colorectal cancer screening methods in usual practice settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20140035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements        ISSN: 1553-0779


  29 in total

1.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  How to improve colon cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Luiz Ronaldo Alberti; Diego Paim Carvalho Garcia; Debora Lucciola Coelho; David Correa Alves De Lima; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

3.  Early detection of colon cancer-the kaiser permanente northwest 30-year history: how do we measure success? Is it the test, the number of tests, the stage, or the percentage of screen-detected patients?

Authors:  David Moiel; John Thompson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2011

Review 4.  FIT testing: an overview.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; James Allison
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

5.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Measurement of colorectal cancer test use with medical claims data in a safety-net health system.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Liyue Tong; Paula Anderson; Bonnie Rose; Elizabeth Carter; Mark Koch; Keith Argenbright; Chul Ahn; James Allison; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Adam A Powell; Ann Bangerter; Krysten Halek; James F Burgess; Deborah A Fisher; David B Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The effects of test preference, test access, and navigation on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Constantine Daskalakis; Sally W Vernon; Randa Sifri; Melissa DiCarlo; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Andrel Sendecki; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Adana A Llanos; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Chul-joo Lee; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08

10.  Relationship of colorectal cancer awareness and knowledge with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Heather M Brandt; Heather R Dolinger; Patricia A Sharpe; James W Hardin; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.