Literature DB >> 20138325

Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Sébastien Gaujoux1, Alexandre Cortes, Anne Couvelard, Séverine Noullet, Laurent Clavel, Vinciane Rebours, Philippe Lévy, Alain Sauvanet, Philippe Ruszniewski, Jacques Belghiti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains a challenging problem. The only commonly accepted risk factor is the soft consistency of the pancreatic remnant.
METHODS: In all, 100 consecutive patients underwent PD. All data, including commonly accepted risk factors for PF and PF defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula, were collected prospectively. On the pancreatic margin, a score of fibrosis and a score of fatty infiltration were assessed by a pathologist blinded to the postoperative course.
RESULTS: PF occurred in 31% of patients. In univariate analysis, male sex, age greater than 58 years, body mass index (BMI) > or =25 kg/m(2), pre-operative high blood pressure, operation for nonintraductal papillary and mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) disease and for ampullary carcinoma, operative time, blood loss, soft consistency of the pancreatic remnant, absence of pancreatic fibrosis, and presence of fatty infiltration of the pancreas were associated with a greater risk of PF. In a multivariate analysis, only BMI > or =25 kg/m(2), absence of pancreatic fibrosis, and presence of fatty pancreas were significant predictors of PF. A score based on the number of risk factors present divided the patient population into 4 subgroups carrying a risk of PF that ranged from 7% (no risk factor) to 78% (3 risk factors) and from 0% to 81%, taking into account only symptomatic PF (grade B and C).
CONCLUSION: The presence of an increased BMI, the presence of fatty pancreas, and the absence of pancreatic fibrosis as risk factors of PF allows a more precise and objective prediction of PF than the consistency of pancreatic remnant alone. A predictive score based on these 3 factors could help to tailor preventive measures. Copyright 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20138325     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  106 in total

1.  Tobacco Smoking Associated With Increased Anastomotic Disruption Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Alessandra Landmann; Casey S Butler; Morgan M Bonds; Laura E Fischer; Russell G Postier; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Impact of body mass index for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Elena Rangelova; Christoph Ansorge; John Blomberg; Ralf Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2013-05-15

3.  Preoperative Nutritional Assessment Using the Controlling Nutritional Status Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masashi Utsumi; Hideki Aoki; Seichi Nagahisa; Seitaro Nishimura; Yuta Une; Yuji Kimura; Fumitaka Taniguchi; Takashi Arata; Koh Katsuda; Kohji Tanakaya
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Despoina Daskalaki; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Stefano Crippa; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Preoperative body mass index-to-prognostic nutritional index ratio predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Toshihisa Tamura; Noritaka Minagawa; Keiji Hirata
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Body mass index and outcomes from pancreatic resection: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew M Ramsey; Robert C Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  The clinical significance of pancreatic steatosis.

Authors:  Mark M Smits; Erwin J M van Geenen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center.

Authors:  Luciano De Carlis; Fabio Ferla; Stefano Di Sandro; Alessandro Giacomoni; Riccardo De Carlis; Raffaella Sguinzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

9.  Pancreatoduodenectomy - preventing complications.

Authors:  Prasanth Penumadu; Savio G Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-19

10.  Is the enteral replacement of externally drained pancreatic juice valuable after pancreatoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tomoki Ebata; Tsuyoshi Igami; Gen Sugawara; Masato Nagino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.