BACKGROUND: The range of human milk docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentrations worldwide is much broader than the range explored in randomized clinical trials to date. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the effect of 4 amounts of DHA supplementation on the visual acuityof formula-fed infants at 12 mo of age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate visual acuity maturation, red blood cell fatty acids, tolerance, anthropometric measures, and adverse events. DESIGN: This double-masked, randomized trial was conducted at 2 sites (Dallas and Kansas City). Three hundred forty-three healthy, term, formula-fed infants were enrolled at 1-9 d of age and were randomly assigned to be fed 1 of the following 4 infant formulas containing equivalent nutrient amounts, except for long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: control (0% DHA), 0.32% DHA, 0.64% DHA, or 0.96% DHA; DHA-supplemented formulas also provided 0.64% arachidonic acid. Visual acuity was measured by visual evoked potentials in 244 infants who completed the 12-mo primary outcome examination. RESULTS: Infants fed control formula had significantly poorer visual evoked potential visual acuity at 12 mo of age than did infants who received any of the DHA-supplemented formulas (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in visual evoked potential visual acuity between the 3 amounts of DHA supplementation for either site at any age tested. CONCLUSIONS:DHA supplementation of infant formula at 0.32% of total fatty acids improves visual acuity. Higher amounts of DHA supplementation were not associated with additional improvement of visual acuity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00753818.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The range of human milk docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concentrations worldwide is much broader than the range explored in randomized clinical trials to date. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the effect of 4 amounts of DHA supplementation on the visual acuity of formula-fed infants at 12 mo of age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate visual acuity maturation, red blood cell fatty acids, tolerance, anthropometric measures, and adverse events. DESIGN: This double-masked, randomized trial was conducted at 2 sites (Dallas and Kansas City). Three hundred forty-three healthy, term, formula-fed infants were enrolled at 1-9 d of age and were randomly assigned to be fed 1 of the following 4 infant formulas containing equivalent nutrient amounts, except for long-chainpolyunsaturated fatty acids: control (0% DHA), 0.32% DHA, 0.64% DHA, or 0.96% DHA; DHA-supplemented formulas also provided 0.64% arachidonic acid. Visual acuity was measured by visual evoked potentials in 244 infants who completed the 12-mo primary outcome examination. RESULTS:Infants fed control formula had significantly poorer visual evoked potential visual acuity at 12 mo of age than did infants who received any of the DHA-supplemented formulas (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in visual evoked potential visual acuity between the 3 amounts of DHA supplementation for either site at any age tested. CONCLUSIONS:DHA supplementation of infant formula at 0.32% of total fatty acids improves visual acuity. Higher amounts of DHA supplementation were not associated with additional improvement of visual acuity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00753818.
Authors: Michelle E Schober; Daniela F Requena; J Alan Maschek; James Cox; Leonardo Parra; Alyssa Lolofie Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: L M Currie; E A Tolley; J M Thodosoff; E H Kerling; D K Sullivan; J Colombo; S E Carlson Journal: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: Cynthia Tyburczy; Kumar S D Kothapalli; Woo Jung Park; Bryant S Blank; Kathryn L Bradford; J Paul Zimmer; Christopher M Butt; Norman Salem; J Thomas Brenna Journal: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: John Colombo; Susan E Carlson; Carol L Cheatham; D Jill Shaddy; Elizabeth H Kerling; Jocelynn M Thodosoff; Kathleen M Gustafson; Caitlin Brez Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: John Colombo; Susan E Carlson; Carol L Cheatham; Kathleen M Fitzgerald-Gustafson; Amy Kepler; Tasha Doty Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Amanda M Foiles; Elizabeth H Kerling; Jo A Wick; Deolinda M F Scalabrin; John Colombo; Susan E Carlson Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 6.377