UNLABELLED: We aimed to improve the quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest changes in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) studies for the optimal automatic detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Rest-stress (99m)Tc MPS studies (997 cases; 651 consecutive cases with correlating angiography and 346 cases with less than 5% likelihood (low likelihood [LLK]) of CAD) were analyzed. Normal limits for stress-rest changes were derived from additional LLK patients (40 women, 40 men). We computed the global stress-rest change (C-SR) by integrating direct stress-rest changes for each polar map pixel. Additionally, stress-rest change and total perfusion deficit (TPD) at stress were combined in 1 variable (C-TPD) for the optimal detection of CAD. RESULTS: The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for C-SR (0.92) was larger than that for stress TPD-rest TPD (0.88) for the identification of stenosis of 70% or more (P < 0.0001). AUC (0.94) and sensitivity (90%) for C-TPD were higher than those for stress TPD (0.91 and 83%, respectively) (P < 0.0001), whereas specificity remained the same (81%). CONCLUSION: C-SR and C-TPD provide higher diagnostic performance than difference between stress and rest TPD or stress hypoperfusion analysis.
UNLABELLED: We aimed to improve the quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest changes in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) studies for the optimal automatic detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Rest-stress (99m)Tc MPS studies (997 cases; 651 consecutive cases with correlating angiography and 346 cases with less than 5% likelihood (low likelihood [LLK]) of CAD) were analyzed. Normal limits for stress-rest changes were derived from additional LLK patients (40 women, 40 men). We computed the global stress-rest change (C-SR) by integrating direct stress-rest changes for each polar map pixel. Additionally, stress-rest change and total perfusion deficit (TPD) at stress were combined in 1 variable (C-TPD) for the optimal detection of CAD. RESULTS: The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for C-SR (0.92) was larger than that for stress TPD-rest TPD (0.88) for the identification of stenosis of 70% or more (P < 0.0001). AUC (0.94) and sensitivity (90%) for C-TPD were higher than those for stress TPD (0.91 and 83%, respectively) (P < 0.0001), whereas specificity remained the same (81%). CONCLUSION: C-SR and C-TPD provide higher diagnostic performance than difference between stress and rest TPD or stress hypoperfusion analysis.
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Mathews B Fish; Santiago Lorenzo; Hidetaka Nishina; James Gerlach; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Cigdem Akincioglu; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Tali Sharir; Xingping Kang; Guido Germano; Jeroen J Bax; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: G Germano; H Kiat; P B Kavanagh; M Moriel; M Mazzanti; H T Su; K F Van Train; D S Berman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C W White; C B Wright; D B Doty; L F Hiratza; C L Eastham; D G Harrison; M L Marcus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arik Wolak; Piotr J Slomka; Mathews B Fish; Santiago Lorenzo; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Usaf E Aladl; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kim A Williams; Robert A Schuster; Kim A Williams; Candace M Schneider; Hemlata K Pokharna Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Helen Fransson; Michael Ljungberg; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Robert J H Miller; Jennifer M Renaud; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: R S Driessen; P G Raijmakers; I Danad; W J Stuijfzand; S P Schumacher; J A Leipsic; J K Min; J Knuuti; A A Lammertsma; A C van Rossum; N van Royen; S R Underwood; P Knaapen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 9.236