Literature DB >> 20119522

Equivalence class formation in a trace stimulus pairing two-response format: effects of response labels and prior programmed transitivity induction.

Lanny Fields1, Erica Doran, Michael Marroquin.   

Abstract

Three experiments identified factors that did and did not enhance the formation of two-node four-member equivalence classes when training and testing were conducted with trials presented in a trace stimulus pairing two-response (SP2R) format. All trials contained two separately presented stimuli. Half of the trials, called within-class trials, contained stimuli from the same class while the other half, called cross class trials, contained stimuli from different classes. On within class trials, making a YES response was correct and making a NO response was wrong. On cross class trials, making a NO response was correct and making a YES response was wrong. In Experiment 1, similar intermediate percentages of participants (about 50%) formed classes, regardless of whether the responses were labeled YES and NO or SAME and DIFF. Response labeling thus did not influence class formation. Regardless of response labels, failures of class formation were primarily due to failure of class-indicative responding produced by within-class transitivity probes. In Experiment 2, only 50% of participants formed classes without prior training, as in Experiment 1, but 100% of participants formed equivalence classes after the establishment of a generalized transitivity repertoire by use of a programmed transitivity induction protocol. Experiment 3 examined two components of the programmed transitivity induction protocol and found that the exclusion of AC trials had no effect on the percentage of participants who formed equivalence classes, while presenting the stimulus sets in randomized order interfered with equivalence class formation. A further analysis found that a number of stimulus control topographies differentiated between individuals who did and did not form equivalence classes. In general, then, these experiments demonstrate that equivalence classes can be formed reliably when training and testing are conducted in an SP2R format, supporting the view that equivalence class formation can account for the development of conceptual categories in natural settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  college students; equivalence classes; generalized transitivity repertoire; keyboarding; successive matching trial format; trace stimulus-pairing two-response trial format

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20119522      PMCID: PMC2707141          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  24 in total

1.  A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding.

Authors:  V A Cullinan; D Barne-Holmes; P M Smeets
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires.

Authors:  D Carr; K M Wilkinson; D Blackman; W J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: effect of training with multiple domains, samples, and comparisons.

Authors:  Lanny Fields; Kenneth F Reeve; Priya Matneja; Antonios Varelas; James Belanich; Adrienne Fitzer; Kim Shamoun
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Teaching arbitrary matching via sample stimulus-control shaping to young children and mentally retarded individuals: a methodological note.

Authors:  D M Zygmont; R M Lazar; W V Dube; W J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.

Authors:  S Dymond; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

7.  Blank comparison analysis of emergent symbolic mapping by young children.

Authors:  K M Wilkinson; W J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-11

8.  Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.

Authors:  M Sidman; B Kirk; M Willson-Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

10.  Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded subjects: programming acquisition and learning set.

Authors:  K J Saunders; J E Spradlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relational discrimination by pigeons in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: a methodological note.

Authors:  Heloísa Cursi Campos; Paula Debert; Romariz da Silva Barros; William J McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Derived relational responding: a comparison of match-to-sample and the relational completion procedure.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Robert Whelan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa J Swisher
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Computational Simulation of Equivalence Class Formation Using the go/no-go Procedure with Compound Stimuli.

Authors:  Renato Roberto Vernucio; Paula Debert
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2016-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.