Literature DB >> 2011773

Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws. Effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae.

D C George1, M H Krag, C C Johnson, M E Van Hal, L D Haugh, L J Grobler.   

Abstract

In each of eight thoracolumbar human cadaveric vertebrae, a hole was made through one pedicle into the vertebral body with a drill bit and through the contralateral pedicle with a probe. Identical metal screws were implanted into the holes to equal depths, and maximum pull-out force was determined for each screw. Using a paired Student t test, no significant difference (P = 0.87) was found in pull-out strength between the screws implanted into drilled holes and those implanted into probed holes. In fact, the average pull-out strengths for the two groups differed by less than 2%. The pedicular cortex was broken through during hole preparation in 5 of the 16 pedicles: 3 as a result of drilling and 2 secondary to probing. The average pull-out strength of the screws in these five pedicles was 11.0% less than the average pull-out strength of the screws implanted into the contralateral intact pedicles. Although this does not represent a statistically significant difference (P = 0.15), it suggests that damaging the pedicular cortex may weaken pedicle screw fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2011773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  How pilot-hole size affects bone-screw pullout strength in human cadaveric cancellous bone.

Authors:  Mark Steeves; Craig Stone; John Mogaard; Stephanie Byrne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; J D O'Holleran; J J Crisco; R Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients.

Authors:  T Laine; K Mäkitalo; D Schlenzka; K Tallroth; M Poussa; A Alho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature.

Authors:  F Perna; R Borghi; F Pilla; N Stefanini; A Mazzotti; M Chehrassan
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-19

6.  Results of the AO spinal internal fixator in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  S Akalm; M Kiş; I T Benli; M Citak; E F Mumcu; M Tüzüner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Augmented posterior instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Krappinger; T J Kastenberger; R Schmid
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Alendronate treatment improves bone-pedicle screw interface fixation in posterior lateral spine fusion: an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Qingyun Xue; Haisheng Li; Xuenong Zou; Michel Dalstra; Martin Lind; Finn B Christensen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Pullout strength of misplaced pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae - A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Shyam K Saraf; Ravindra P Singh; Vakil Singh; Ashish Varma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging (O-arm) for assessment of pedicle screw position: Does it prevent unacceptable screw placement?

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; David W Polly; Charles Gerald T Ledonio; Edward Rainier G Santos
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.