Literature DB >> 20116784

The role of experience in location estimation: Target distributions shift location memory biases.

John Lipinski1, Vanessa R Simmering, Jeffrey S Johnson, John P Spencer.   

Abstract

Research based on the Category Adjustment model concluded that the spatial distribution of target locations does not influence location estimation responses [Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75-97]. This conflicts with earlier results showing that location estimation is biased relative to the spatial distribution of targets [Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16-37]. Here, we resolve this controversy by using a task based on Huttenlocher et al. (Experiment 4) with minor modifications to enhance our ability to detect experience-dependent effects. Results after the first block of trials replicate the pattern reported in Huttenlocher et al. After additional experience, however, participants showed biases that significantly shifted according to the target distributions. These results are consistent with the Dynamic Field Theory, an alternative theory of spatial cognition that integrates long-term memory traces across trials relative to the perceived structure of the task space. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20116784      PMCID: PMC2830296          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.

Authors:  L E Crawford; T Regier; J Huttenlocher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-06-15

2.  Spatial categories and the estimation of location.

Authors:  Janellen Huttenlocher; Larry V Hedges; Bryce Corrigan; L Elizabeth Crawford
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-09

3.  Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Within-category feature correlations and Bayesian adjustment strategies.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Crawford; Janellen Huttenlocher; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Local and global mechanisms of one- and two-dimensional orientation illusions.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; R van der Zwan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

6.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Alycia M Hund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

8.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries.

Authors:  S E Palmer; K Hemenway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; J L Vevea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-06

10.  Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Alycia M Hund
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Stronger neural dynamics capture changes in infants' visual working memory capacity over development.

Authors:  Sammy Perone; Vanessa R Simmering; John P Spencer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-09-17

3.  Estimation in self-initiated working memory for spatial locations.

Authors:  Hagit Magen; Tatiana Aloi Emmanouil
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Developmental improvements in the resolution and capacity of visual working memory share a common source.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Hilary E Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Behavioral dynamics and neural grounding of a dynamic field theory of multi-object tracking.

Authors:  J P Spencer; K Barich; J Goldberg; S Perone
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Contributions of Dynamic Systems Theory to Cognitive Development.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Andrew Austin; Anne R Schutte
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

7.  The flexible use of inductive and geometric spatial categories.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Crawford; Erin L Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

8.  Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Evelina Dineva; John P Spencer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Autonomy in action: linking the act of looking to memory formation in infancy via dynamic neural fields.

Authors:  Sammy Perone; John P Spencer
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.