Literature DB >> 20116114

Evaluation of early metabolic responses in rectal cancer during combined radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone: sequential FDG-PET-CT findings.

Marco H M Janssen1, Michel C Ollers, Ruud G P M van Stiphout, Jeroen Buijsen, Jørgen van den Bogaard, Dirk de Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Guido Lammering.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate metabolic changes of rectal tumors after 1 week of treatment of either radiochemotherapy (28 x 1.8 Gy+Capecitabine) (RCT) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (5 x 5 Gy) alone (RT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty-six rectal cancer patients, 25 RCT- and 21 RT-patients, were included in this study. Sequential FDG-PET-CT scans were performed for each of the included patients both prior to treatment and after the first week of treatment. Consecutively, the metabolic treatment response of the tumor was evaluated.
RESULTS: For the patients referred for pre-operative RCT, significant reductions of SUV(mean) (p<0.001) and SUV(max) (p<0.001) within the tumor were found already after the first week of treatment (8 Gy biological equivalent dose (BED). In contrast, 1 week of treatment with RT alone did not result in significant changes in the metabolic activity of the tumor (p=0.767, p=0.434), despite the higher applied RT dose of 38.7 Gy BED.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiochemotherapy of rectal cancer leads to significant early changes in the metabolic activity of the tumor, which was not the case early after hypofractionated radiotherapy alone, despite the higher radiotherapy dose given. Thus, the chemotherapeutic agent Capecitabine might be responsible for the early metabolic treatment responses during radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20116114     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  13 in total

1.  Novel Carcinoembryonic-Antigen-(CEA)-Specific Pretargeting System to Assess Tumor Cell Viability after Irradiation of Colorectal Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Birgit Meller; Margarete Rave-Fränck; Christian Breunig; Markus Schirmer; Manfred Baehre; Roger Nadrowitz; Torsten Liersch; Johannes Meller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Early FDG PET response assessment of preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation with long-term outcome.

Authors:  Antonio Avallone; Luigi Aloj; Corradina Caracò; Paolo Delrio; Biagio Pecori; Fabiana Tatangelo; Nigel Scott; Rossana Casaretti; Francesca Di Gennaro; Massimo Montano; Lucrezia Silvestro; Alfredo Budillon; Secondo Lastoria
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Combined value of apparent diffusion coefficient-standardized uptake value max in evaluation of post-treated locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Davide Fior; Chiara Trattenero; Elena De Ponti; Silvia Drago; Luca Guerra; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

5.  Molecular mechanism underlying the detection of colorectal cancer by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Kunihiko Izuishi; Yuka Yamamoto; Takanori Sano; Ryusuke Takebayashi; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Hirohito Mori; Tsutomu Masaki; Asahiro Morishita; Yasuyuki Suzuki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guido Lammering; Dirk De Ruysscher; Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Jacques Borger; Ludy Lutgens; Piet van den Ende; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  PET-CT for radiotherapy treatment planning and response monitoring in solid tumors.

Authors:  Johan Bussink; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of management strategies.

Authors:  Robert Glynne-Jones; Miranda Kronfli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.

Authors:  Renata Salgado Fernandes; Carolina de Aguiar Ferreira; Daniel Cristian Ferreira Soares; Anna Margherita Maffione; Danyelle M Townsend; Domenico Rubello; André Luís Branco de Barros
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.529

10.  MR imaging perfusion and diffusion analysis to assess preoperative Short Course Radiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer: Standardized Index of Shape by DCE-MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters by DW-MRI.

Authors:  Antonella Petrillo; Roberta Fusco; Vincenza Granata; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Mario Sansone; Daniela Rega; Paolo Delrio; Francesco Bianco; Giovanni Maria Romano; Fabiana Tatangelo; Antonio Avallone; Biagio Pecori
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.