Literature DB >> 20110339

Interhemispheric modulation induced by cortical stimulation and motor training.

Julie A Williams1, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Felipe Fregni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interhemispheric inhibition might be a beneficial cortico-cortical interaction, but also might be maladaptive in people with neurological disorders. One recently revisited technique that has been shown to be effective in improving motor function in people with stroke using interhemispheric modulation is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with unilateral motor training with contralateral hand restraint on interhemispheric inhibition between the dominant and nondominant hemispheres of the brain and on motor performance in participants who were healthy.
DESIGN: This was a double-blind, prospective, single-center study with participants who were healthy.
METHODS: Twenty participants who were healthy were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) bilaterally combined with unilateral motor training and contralateral hand restraint. A blinded rater assessed motor function and cortical excitability, including assessment of transcallosal inhibition (TCI).
RESULTS: There was a larger increase in motor performance in the nondominant hand for the active tDCS group compared with the sham tDCS group. In addition, a decrease in cortical excitability in the dominant hemisphere and a decrease in TCI from the dominant to nondominant hemisphere were observed for the active tDCS group only. The TCI decrease in the active tDCS group was correlated with motor performance improvement for the nondominant hand. Limitations Limitations of this study included missing the effect of intracortical inhibition due to a floor effect, not using the optimal tDCS montage, and not being able to assess the effects of other variables such as gender due to the small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that tDCS enhances the effects of unilateral motor training and contralateral hand restraint on motor function, and this benefit is associated with a different mechanism of action characterized by bihemispheric modulation in which TCI from the dominant to the nondominant hemisphere is decreased. Transcranial direct current stimulation might be a useful tool to enhance the motor effects of constraint-induced movement therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20110339     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  58 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as an Exploratory Assessment of Corticospinal Connectivity in Infants After Perinatal Brain Injury: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Samuel T Nemanich; Chao-Ying Chen; Mo Chen; Elizabeth Zorn; Bryon Mueller; Colleen Peyton; Jed T Elison; James Stinear; Raghu Rao; Michael Georgieff; Jeremiah Menk; Kyle Rudser; Bernadette Gillick
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation modulates activation-induced regional blood flow changes during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Caroline Paquette; Michael Sidel; Basia A Radinska; Jean-Paul Soucy; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of object agnosia: a case study.

Authors:  Christina S Konen; Marlene Behrmann; Mayu Nishimura; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

7.  Structural and functional motor cortex asymmetry in unilateral lower limb amputation with phantom limb pain.

Authors:  K Pacheco-Barrios; C B Pinto; F G Saleh Velez; D Duarte; M E Gunduz; M Simis; A C Lepesteur Gianlorenco; J L Barouh; D Crandell; M Guidetti; L Battistella; F Fregni
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Improving Naming Abilities Among Healthy Young-Old Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adi Lifshitz-Ben-Basat; Nira Mashal
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.