Literature DB >> 21559029

Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation modulates activation-induced regional blood flow changes during voluntary movement.

Caroline Paquette1, Michael Sidel, Basia A Radinska, Jean-Paul Soucy, Alexander Thiel.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that induces changes in cortical excitability: anodal stimulation increases while cathodal stimulation reduces excitability. Imaging studies performed after unilateral stimulation have shown conflicting results regarding the effects of tDCS on surrogate markers of neuronal activity. The aim of this study was to directly measure these effects on activation-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow (ΔrCBF) using positron emission tomography (PET) during bilateral tDCS. Nine healthy subjects underwent repeated rCBF measurements with (15)O-water and PET during a simple motor task while receiving tDCS or sham stimulation over the primary motor cortex (M1). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were also assessed before and after real and sham stimulation. During tDCS with active movement, ΔrCBF in M1 was significantly lower on the cathodal than the anodal side when compared with sham stimulation. This decrease in ΔrCBF was accompanied by a decrease in MEP amplitude on the cathodal side. No effect was observed on resting or activated rCBF relative to sham stimulation. We thus conclude that it is the interaction of cathodal tDCS with activation-induced ΔrCBF rather than the effect on resting or activated rCBF itself which constitutes the physiological imaging correlate of tDCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21559029      PMCID: PMC3208154          DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  43 in total

1.  Regional modulation of BOLD MRI responses to human sensorimotor activation by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  J Baudewig; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J Frahm
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Maren S Nitsche; Cornelia C Klein; Frithjof Tergau; John C Rothwell; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Estimation of regional cerebral blood flow levels in ischemia using [(15)O]water of [(11)C]flumazenil PET without arterial input function .

Authors:  A Thiel; J Löttgen; M Grond; U Pietrzyk; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 5.  Brain function and neurophysiological correlates of signals used in functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Martin Lauritzen; Lorenz Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability.

Authors:  Alberto Priori
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: a positron emission tomography activation study.

Authors:  A Thiel; K Herholz; A Koyuncu; M Ghaemi; L W Kracht; B Habedank; W D Heiss
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Michael A Nitsche; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  20 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation promotes functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Michelle Y Cheng; Eric H Wang; Wyatt J Woodson; Stephanie Wang; Guohua Sun; Alex G Lee; Ahmet Arac; Lief E Fenno; Karl Deisseroth; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Non-invasive brain stimulation as add-on therapy for subacute post-stroke aphasia: a randomized trial (NORTHSTAR).

Authors:  Anna Zumbansen; Sandra E Black; Joyce L Chen; Dylan J Edwards; Alexander Hartmann; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Sylvain Lanthier; Paul Lesperance; George Mochizuki; Caroline Paquette; Elizabeth A Rochon; Ilona Rubi-Fessen; Jennie Valles; Heike Kneifel; Susan Wortman-Jutt; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism after 3 weeks of noninvasive electrical stimulation of mild cognitive impairment patients.

Authors:  Kyongsik Yun; In-Uk Song; Yong-An Chung
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  Effector-independent reduction in choice reaction time following bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Gabrielle Hayduk-Costa; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  James Giordano; Marom Bikson; Emily S Kappenman; Vincent P Clark; H Branch Coslett; Michael R Hamblin; Roy Hamilton; Ryan Jankord; Walter J Kozumbo; R Andrew McKinley; Michael A Nitsche; J Patrick Reilly; Jessica Richardson; Rachel Wurzman; Edward Calabrese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Early optimization in finger dexterity of skilled pianists: implication of transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Shinichi Furuya; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation of the lateral cerebellar nucleus promotes persistent functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Aatman M Shah; Shunsuke Ishizaka; Michelle Y Cheng; Eric H Wang; Alex R Bautista; Sabrina Levy; Daniel Smerin; Guohua Sun; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effect of Anodal Direct-Current Stimulation on Cortical Hemodynamic Responses With Laser-Speckle Contrast Imaging.

Authors:  Shuo Hu; Tao Zheng; Yanchao Dong; Juan Du; Lanxiang Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.