Literature DB >> 20106995

Impact of the DRY motif and the missing "ionic lock" on constitutive activity and G-protein coupling of the human histamine H4 receptor.

Erich H Schneider1, David Schnell, Andrea Strasser, Stefan Dove, Roland Seifert.   

Abstract

It is assumed that many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are restrained in an inactive state by the "ionic lock," an interaction between an arginine in transmembrane domain (TM) 3 (R3.50) and a negatively charged residue in TM6 (D/E6.30). In the human histamine H4 receptor (hH4R), alanine is present in position 6.30. To elucidate whether this mutation causes the high constitutive activity of hH4R, we aimed to reconstitute the ionic lock by constructing the A6.30E mutant. The role of R3.50 was investigated by generating hH4R-R3.50A. Both mutants were expressed alone or together with Galpha(i2) and Gbeta1gamma2 in Sf9 cells and characterized in GTPase, 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate binding, and high-affinity agonist binding assays. Unexpectedly, compared with hH4R, hH4R-A6.30E showed only nonsignificant reduction of constitutive activity and G protein-coupling efficiency. The KD of [3H]histamine was unaltered. By contrast, hH4R-R3.50A did not stimulate G proteins. Thioperamide affinity at hH(4)R-R3.50A was increased by 300 to 400%, whereas histamine affinity was reduced by approximately 50%. A model of the active hH4R state in complex with the Galpha(i2) C terminus was compared with the crystal structures of turkey beta1 and human beta2 adrenoceptors. We conclude that 1) constitutive activity of hH4R is facilitated by the salt bridge D5.69-R6.31 rather than by the missing ionic lock, 2) Y3.60 may form alternative locks in active and inactive GPCR states, 3) R3.50 is crucial for hH4R-G protein coupling, and 4) hH4R-R3.50A represents an inactive state with increased inverse agonist and reduced agonist affinity. Thus, the ionic lock, although stabilizing the inactive rhodopsin state, is not generally important for all class A GPCRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106995     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.163220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  27 in total

Review 1.  The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery.

Authors:  John A Salon; David T Lodowski; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Simplified modeling approach suggests structural mechanisms for constitutive activation of the C5a receptor.

Authors:  Gregory V Nikiforovich; Garland R Marshall; Thomas J Baranski
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-30

3.  Expression and functional properties of canine, rat, and murine histamine H₄ receptors in Sf9 insect cells.

Authors:  David Schnell; Irena Brunskole; Katerina Ladova; Erich H Schneider; Patrick Igel; Stefan Dove; Armin Buschauer; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Molecular determinants for the high constitutive activity of the human histamine H4 receptor: functional studies on orthologues and mutants.

Authors:  D Wifling; K Löffel; U Nordemann; A Strasser; G Bernhardt; S Dove; R Seifert; A Buschauer
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Characterization, Dynamics, and Mechanism of CXCR4 Antagonists on a Constitutively Active Mutant.

Authors:  Eric M Rosenberg; Reed E S Harrison; Lun Kelvin Tsou; Natalie Drucker; Brock Humphries; Deepa Rajasekaran; Kathryn E Luker; Chien-Huang Wu; Jen-Shin Song; Chuan-Jen Wang; James W Murphy; Yung-Chi Cheng; Kak-Shan Shia; Gary D Luker; Dimitrios Morikis; Elias J Lolis
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.116

Review 6.  Molecular and cellular analysis of human histamine receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Roland Seifert; Andrea Strasser; Erich H Schneider; Detlef Neumann; Stefan Dove; Armin Buschauer
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  The arginine of the DRY motif in transmembrane segment III functions as a balancing micro-switch in the activation of the β2-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  Louise Valentin-Hansen; Marleen Groenen; Rie Nygaard; Thomas M Frimurer; Nicholas D Holliday; Thue W Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A yeast screening method to decipher the interaction between the adenosine A2B receptor and the C-terminus of different G protein α-subunits.

Authors:  Rongfang Liu; Nick J A Groenewoud; Miriam C Peeters; Eelke B Lenselink; Ad P IJzerman
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.765

9.  Advances in methods to characterize ligand-induced ionic lock and rotamer toggle molecular switch in G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Xiang-Qun Xie; Ananda Chowdhury
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 10.  Conformational flexibility and structural dynamics in GPCR-mediated G protein activation: a perspective.

Authors:  Anita M Preininger; Jens Meiler; Heidi E Hamm
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.