Literature DB >> 22843684

The arginine of the DRY motif in transmembrane segment III functions as a balancing micro-switch in the activation of the β2-adrenergic receptor.

Louise Valentin-Hansen1, Marleen Groenen, Rie Nygaard, Thomas M Frimurer, Nicholas D Holliday, Thue W Schwartz.   

Abstract

Recent high resolution x-ray structures of the β2-adrenergic receptor confirmed a close salt-bridge interaction between the suspected micro-switch residue ArgIII:26 (Arg3.50) and the neighboring AspIII:25 (Asp3.49). However, neither the expected "ionic lock" interactions between ArgIII:26 and GluVI:-06 (Glu6.30) in the inactive conformation nor the interaction with TyrV:24 (Tyr5.58) in the active conformation were observed in the x-ray structures. Here we find through molecular dynamics simulations, after removal of the stabilizing T4 lysozyme, that the expected salt bridge between ArgIII:26 and GluVI:-06 does form relatively easily in the inactive receptor conformation. Moreover, mutational analysis of GluVI:-06 in TM-VI and the neighboring AspIII:25 in TM-III demonstrated that these two residues do function as locks for the inactive receptor conformation as we observed increased G(s) signaling, arrestin mobilization, and internalization upon alanine substitutions. Conversely, TyrV:24 appears to play a role in stabilizing the active receptor conformation as loss of function of G(s) signaling, arrestin mobilization, and receptor internalization was observed upon alanine substitution of TyrV:24. The loss of function of the TyrV:24 mutant could partly be rescued by alanine substitution of either AspIII:25 or GluVI:-06 in the double mutants. Surprisingly, removal of the side chain of the ArgIII:26 micro-switch itself had no effect on G(s) signaling and internalization and only reduced arrestin mobilization slightly. It is suggested that ArgIII:26 is equally important for stabilizing the inactive and the active conformation through interaction with key residues in TM-III, -V, and -VI, but that the ArgIII:26 micro-switch residue itself apparently is not essential for the actual G protein activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843684      PMCID: PMC3442529          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.348565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  36 in total

1.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Sequence analyses of G-protein-coupled receptors: similarities to rhodopsin.

Authors:  Tara Mirzadegan; Gil Benkö; Sławomir Filipek; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Rhodopsin structure, dynamics, and activation: a perspective from crystallography, site-directed spin labeling, sulfhydryl reactivity, and disulfide cross-linking.

Authors:  Wayne L Hubbell; Christian Altenbach; Cheryl M Hubbell; H Gobind Khorana
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

4.  Mutations of the conserved DRS motif in the second intracellular loop of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor affect expression, activation, and internalization.

Authors:  K K Arora; Z Cheng; K J Catt
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1997-08

5.  Conformational compatibility as a basis of differential affinities of tachykinins for the neurokinin-1 receptor.

Authors:  R R Huang; D Huang; C D Strader; T M Fong
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Steric hindrance mutagenesis versus alanine scan in mapping of ligand binding sites in the tachykinin NK1 receptor.

Authors:  B Holst; S Zoffmann; C E Elling; S A Hjorth; T W Schwartz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Mutations of the DRY motif that preserve beta 2-adrenoceptor coupling.

Authors:  A Seibold; M Dagarag; M Birnbaumer
Journal:  Receptors Channels       Date:  1998

8.  Development of a BRET2 screening assay using beta-arrestin 2 mutants.

Authors:  Milka Vrecl; Rasmus Jorgensen; Azra Pogacnik; Anders Heding
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2004-06

9.  Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex.

Authors:  Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian T DeVree; Yaozhong Zou; Andrew C Kruse; Ka Young Chung; Tong Sun Kobilka; Foon Sun Thian; Pil Seok Chae; Els Pardon; Diane Calinski; Jesper M Mathiesen; Syed T A Shah; Joseph A Lyons; Martin Caffrey; Samuel H Gellman; Jan Steyaert; Georgios Skiniotis; William I Weis; Roger K Sunahara; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  In silico study of the structurally similar ORL1 receptor agonist and antagonist pairs reveal possible mechanism of receptor activation.

Authors:  Milan Senćanski; Ljiljana Dosen-Mićović
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Luciferase Complementation Approaches to Measure GPCR Signaling Kinetics and Bias.

Authors:  Nicola C Dijon; Desislava N Nesheva; Nicholas D Holliday
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Stabilization of μ-opioid receptor facilitates its cellular translocation and signaling.

Authors:  Cheng Zhu; Qingjian Han; Alexander Samoshkin; Marino Convertino; Alexander Linton; Edgar M Faison; Ru-Rong Ji; Luda Diatchenko; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-06-12

4.  S-Nitrosylation of β-Arrestins Biases Receptor Signaling and Confers Ligand Independence.

Authors:  Hiroki Hayashi; Douglas T Hess; Rongli Zhang; Keiki Sugi; Huiyun Gao; Bea L Tan; Dawn E Bowles; Carmelo A Milano; Mukesh K Jain; Walter J Koch; Jonathan S Stamler
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Retinal Conformation Changes Rhodopsin's Dynamic Ensemble.

Authors:  Nicholas Leioatts; Tod D Romo; Shairy Azmy Danial; Alan Grossfield
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  PheVI:09 (Phe6.44) as a sliding microswitch in seven-transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptor activation.

Authors:  Louise Valentin-Hansen; Birgitte Holst; Thomas M Frimurer; Thue W Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Analysis of Missense Variants in the Human Histamine Receptor Family Reveals Increased Constitutive Activity of E4106.30×30K Variant in the Histamine H1 Receptor.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Ma; Marta Arimont Segura; Barbara Zarzycka; Henry F Vischer; Rob Leurs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Biased and g protein-independent signaling of chemokine receptors.

Authors:  Anne Steen; Olav Larsen; Stefanie Thiele; Mette M Rosenkilde
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Comparative MD Simulations Indicate a Dual Role for Arg1323.50 in Dopamine-Dependent D2R Activation.

Authors:  Ralf C Kling; Timothy Clark; Peter Gmeiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning.

Authors:  Eric M Jones; Nathan B Lubock; A J Venkatakrishnan; Jeffrey Wang; Alex M Tseng; Joseph M Paggi; Naomi R Latorraca; Daniel Cancilla; Megan Satyadi; Jessica E Davis; M Madan Babu; Ron O Dror; Sriram Kosuri
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.