Literature DB >> 29363843

What does scalp electroencephalogram coherence tell us about long-range cortical networks?

Adam C Snyder1,2,3, Deepa Issar4, Matthew A Smith2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Long-range interactions between cortical areas are undoubtedly a key to the computational power of the brain. For healthy human subjects, the premier method for measuring brain activity on fast timescales is electroencephalography (EEG), and coherence between EEG signals is often used to assay functional connectivity between different brain regions. However, the nature of the underlying brain activity that is reflected in EEG coherence is currently the realm of speculation, because seldom have EEG signals been recorded simultaneously with intracranial recordings near cell bodies in multiple brain areas. Here, we take the early steps towards narrowing this gap in our understanding of EEG coherence by measuring local field potentials with microelectrode arrays in two brain areas (extrastriate visual area V4 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) simultaneously with EEG at the nearby scalp in rhesus macaque monkeys. Although we found inter-area coherence at both scales of measurement, we did not find that scalp-level coherence was reliably related to coherence between brain areas measured intracranially on a trial-to-trial basis, despite that scalp-level EEG was related to other important features of neural oscillations, such as trial-to-trial variability in overall amplitudes. This suggests that caution must be exercised when interpreting EEG coherence effects, and new theories devised about what aspects of neural activity long-range coherence in the EEG reflects.
© 2018 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coherence; connectivity; electroencephalogram; local field potential; monkey

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363843      PMCID: PMC6497452          DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  69 in total

1.  Functional coupling shows stronger stimulus dependency for fast oscillations than for low-frequency components in striate cortex of awake monkey.

Authors:  A Frien; R Eckhorn
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Matthew F Glasser; Donna L Dierker; John Harwell; Timothy Coalson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Visual stimulation elicits locked and induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG-potentials, but not in human EEG.

Authors:  E Juergens; A Guettler; R Eckhorn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Parkinson's disease as a disconnection syndrome.

Authors:  Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Tests of EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in the human brain.

Authors:  B N Cuffin; D Cohen; K Yunokuchi; R Maniewski; C Purcell; G R Cosgrove; J Ives; J Kennedy; D Schomer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 8.  Schizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome?

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith
Journal:  Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995

9.  Content-specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory.

Authors:  R F Salazar; N M Dotson; S L Bressler; C M Gray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Automatic identification and removal of scalp reference signal for intracranial EEGs based on independent component analysis.

Authors:  Sanqing Hu; Matt Stead; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  5 in total

1.  Distinct Sources of Variability Affect Eye Movement Preparation.

Authors:  Sanjeev B Khanna; Adam C Snyder; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  EEG Signals Index a Global Signature of Arousal Embedded in Neuronal Population Recordings.

Authors:  Richard Johnston; Adam C Snyder; Rachel S Schibler; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Decoding of Attentional State Using High-Frequency Local Field Potential Is As Accurate As Using Spikes.

Authors:  Surya S Prakash; Aritra Das; Sidrat Tasawoor Kanth; J Patrick Mayo; Supratim Ray
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  A comparison between scalp- and source-reconstructed EEG networks.

Authors:  Margherita Lai; Matteo Demuru; Arjan Hillebrand; Matteo Fraschini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Monkey EEG links neuronal color and motion information across species and scales.

Authors:  Florian Sandhaeger; Constantin von Nicolai; Earl K Miller; Markus Siegel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.