Literature DB >> 12878284

Randomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion, with 5 years' follow-up.

Päivi Pakarinen1, Juhani Toivonen, Tapani Luukkainen.   

Abstract

Women who seek an abortion are motivated to use contraceptive methods afterwards. Because the return of fertility after abortion is immediate, there is a need for effective and safe contraception promptly after the termination of pregnancy. A randomized trial of Mirena and NovaT intrauterine contraceptive devices inserted at the time of elective termination of pregnancy, duration no more than 12 weeks, is reported here. Women were randomized 2:1 resulting in 305 subjects with Mirena and 133 with NovaT as a segment of a larger study of 3000 women. In the Mirena group, two pregnancies at year 4 resulted in a final gross rate of 0.8 at 5 years, which was significantly (p < 0.0004) lower than the corresponding rate of 9.5 with NovaT. Terminations because of expulsion, bleeding problems, pain, pelvic inflammatory disease and other medical reasons were less common in the Mirena group, but not significantly different. The cumulative expulsion gross rate for NovaT at 5 years was 15.4 and for Mirena it was 10.5. Termination rates because of amenorrhea were low in both groups. It is concluded that both devices were well tolerated. Mirena was more effective and the rate of adverse events was lower than with NovaT. Special attention should be paid to the insertion procedure when carried out at the time of abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878284     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00104-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

Review 1.  Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Babasola O Okusanya; Olabisi Oduwole; Emmanuel E Effa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-28

2.  Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Katherine J Hladky; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy V Norman; Janusz Kaczorowski; Judith A Soon; Rollin Brant; Stirling Bryan; Konia J Trouton; Lyda Dicus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Chandra Kailasam; David Cahill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability.

Authors:  Megan N Beatty; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ingrid Sääv; Olof Stephansson; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expulsion and continuation rates after postabortion insertion of framed IUDs versus frameless IUDs - review of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Norman D Goldstuck
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.