BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately half of the families that fulfill Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) do not have evidence of the germline mismatch repair gene mutations that define this syndrome and result in microsatellite instability (MSI). The carcinogenic pathways and the best diagnostic approaches to detect microsatellite stable (MSS) HNPCC tumors are unclear. We investigated the contribution of epigenetic alterations to the development of MSS HNPCC tumors. METHODS: Colorectal cancers were divided into 4 groups: (1) microsatellite stable, Amsterdam-positive (MSS HNPCC) (N = 22); (2) Lynch syndrome cancers (identified mismatch repair mutations) (N = 21); (3) sporadic MSS (N = 92); and (4) sporadic MSI (N = 46). Methylation status was evaluated for CACNAG1, SOCS1, RUNX3, NEUROG1, MLH1, and long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1). KRAS and BRAF mutation status was analyzed. RESULTS: MSS HNPCC tumors displayed a significantly lower degree of LINE-1 methylation, a marker for global methylation, than any other group. Although most MSS HNPCC tumors had some degree of CpG island methylation, none presented a high index of methylation. MSS HNPCC tumors had KRAS mutations exclusively in codon 12, but none harbored V600E BRAF mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors from Amsterdam-positive patients without mismatch repair deficiency (MSS HNPCC) have certain molecular features, including global hypomethylation, that distinguish them from all other colorectal cancers. These characteristics could have an important impact on tumor behavior or treatment response. Studies are underway to further assess the cause and effects of these features. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Approximately half of the families that fulfill Amsterdam criteria for Lynch syndrome or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) do not have evidence of the germline mismatch repair gene mutations that define this syndrome and result in microsatellite instability (MSI). The carcinogenic pathways and the best diagnostic approaches to detect microsatellite stable (MSS) HNPCC tumors are unclear. We investigated the contribution of epigenetic alterations to the development of MSS HNPCC tumors. METHODS:Colorectal cancers were divided into 4 groups: (1) microsatellite stable, Amsterdam-positive (MSS HNPCC) (N = 22); (2) Lynch syndrome cancers (identified mismatch repair mutations) (N = 21); (3) sporadic MSS (N = 92); and (4) sporadic MSI (N = 46). Methylation status was evaluated for CACNAG1, SOCS1, RUNX3, NEUROG1, MLH1, and long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1). KRAS and BRAF mutation status was analyzed. RESULTS:MSS HNPCC tumors displayed a significantly lower degree of LINE-1 methylation, a marker for global methylation, than any other group. Although most MSS HNPCC tumors had some degree of CpG island methylation, none presented a high index of methylation. MSS HNPCC tumors had KRAS mutations exclusively in codon 12, but none harbored V600EBRAF mutations. CONCLUSIONS:Tumors from Amsterdam-positive patients without mismatch repair deficiency (MSS HNPCC) have certain molecular features, including global hypomethylation, that distinguish them from all other colorectal cancers. These characteristics could have an important impact on tumor behavior or treatment response. Studies are underway to further assess the cause and effects of these features. Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Allen S Yang; Marcos R H Estécio; Ketan Doshi; Yutaka Kondo; Eloiza H Tajara; Jean-Pierre J Issa Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: R D Kolodner; J D Tytell; J L Schmeits; M F Kane; R D Gupta; J Weger; S Wahlberg; E A Fox; D Peel; A Ziogas; J E Garber; S Syngal; H Anton-Culver; F P Li Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hidewaki Nakagawa; Janet C Lockman; Wendy L Frankel; Heather Hampel; Kelle Steenblock; Lawrence J Burgart; Stephen N Thibodeau; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Inês Francisco; Cristina Albuquerque; Pedro Lage; Hélio Belo; Inês Vitoriano; Bruno Filipe; Isabel Claro; Sara Ferreira; Paula Rodrigues; Paula Chaves; Carlos Nobre Leitão; António Dias Pereira Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Rodrigo Jover; Thuy-Phuong Nguyen; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Pedro Zapater; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; Estefanía Rojas; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Juan D Morillas; Juan Clofent; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Xavier Bessa; Rosa M Xicola; David Nicolás-Pérez; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Xavier Llor; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Brigid S Boland; Christella E Widjaja; Asoka Banno; Bing Zhang; Stephanie H Kim; Samantha Stoven; Michael R Peterson; Marilyn C Jones; H Irene Su; Sheila E Crowe; Jack D Bui; Samuel B Ho; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Ajay Goel; Eric V Marietta; Mahdieh Khosroheidari; Kristen Jepsen; Jose Aramburu; Cristina López-Rodríguez; William J Sandborn; Joseph A Murray; Olivier Harismendy; John T Chang Journal: J Immunol Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Nishihara; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew H Beck; Edward Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 7.842