PURPOSE: The RAS-RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediate the cellular response to growth signals. In melanocytes, BRAF is involved in cAMP-dependent growth signals. Recently, activating mutations in the BRAF gene, were reported in a large proportion of melanomas. We have studied mutations in the BRAF gene and their association with clinical parameters. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed exons 1, 11, and 15 of the BRAF gene and exons 1 and 2 of the N-ras gene for mutations in 38 metastatic melanomas by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate analyses were used to correlate mutations with various clinical parameters. RESULTS: Mutations in exon 15 of the BRAF gene were detected in 26 (68%) melanomas. In 25 cases, mutation involved the "hot spot" codon 600(2)of the BRAF gene. Three melanomas without a BRAF mutation carried amino acid substituting base changes at codon 61 of the N-ras gene. In a multivariate proportional hazard (Cox) model, BRAF mutation, along with the stage of metastatic melanomas, showed a statistically significant hazard ratio of 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.02-4.59; chi(2) for the model 6.94, degrees of freedom 2, P = 0.03) for diminished duration of response to the treatment. In a Kaplan-Meier survival model, cases with BRAF mutation showed longer disease-free survival (median of 12 months) than cases without mutation (median of 5 months), although this association was not statistically significant (Log-rank test P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our results, besides confirming the high frequency of BRAF mutations in metastatic melanomas, also underline the potential importance of these mutations in disease outcome.
PURPOSE: The RAS-RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediate the cellular response to growth signals. In melanocytes, BRAF is involved in cAMP-dependent growth signals. Recently, activating mutations in the BRAF gene, were reported in a large proportion of melanomas. We have studied mutations in the BRAF gene and their association with clinical parameters. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed exons 1, 11, and 15 of the BRAF gene and exons 1 and 2 of the N-ras gene for mutations in 38 metastatic melanomas by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate analyses were used to correlate mutations with various clinical parameters. RESULTS: Mutations in exon 15 of the BRAF gene were detected in 26 (68%) melanomas. In 25 cases, mutation involved the "hot spot" codon 600(2)of the BRAF gene. Three melanomas without a BRAF mutation carried amino acid substituting base changes at codon 61 of the N-ras gene. In a multivariate proportional hazard (Cox) model, BRAF mutation, along with the stage of metastatic melanomas, showed a statistically significant hazard ratio of 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.02-4.59; chi(2) for the model 6.94, degrees of freedom 2, P = 0.03) for diminished duration of response to the treatment. In a Kaplan-Meier survival model, cases with BRAF mutation showed longer disease-free survival (median of 12 months) than cases without mutation (median of 5 months), although this association was not statistically significant (Log-rank test P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our results, besides confirming the high frequency of BRAF mutations in metastatic melanomas, also underline the potential importance of these mutations in disease outcome.
Authors: Paul B Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B Haanen; Paolo Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Steven J O'Day; Jeffrey A Sosman; John M Kirkwood; Alexander M M Eggermont; Brigitte Dreno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J Lee; Keith T Flaherty; Grant A McArthur Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carol Beadling; Michael C Heinrich; Andrea Warrick; Erin M Forbes; Dylan Nelson; Emily Justusson; Judith Levine; Tanaya L Neff; Janice Patterson; Ajia Presnell; Arin McKinley; Laura J Winter; Christie Dewey; Amy Harlow; Oscar Barney; Brian J Druker; Kathryn G Schuff; Christopher L Corless Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Daniel N Cagney; Brian M Alexander; F Stephen Hodi; Elizabeth I Buchbinder; Patrick A Ott; Ayal A Aizer Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Arati Sharma; Melissa A Tran; Shile Liang; Arun K Sharma; Shantu Amin; Charles D Smith; Cheng Dong; Gavin P Robertson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stuart J Gallagher; John F Thompson; James Indsto; Lyndee L Scurr; Margaret Lett; Bo-Fu Gao; Ruth Dunleavey; Graham J Mann; Richard F Kefford; Helen Rizos Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.715