Literature DB >> 28429269

Alternative carbon dioxide modelling approaches accounting for high residual gases in LandGEM.

Nathan Bruce1, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng2, Amy Richter1.   

Abstract

High Canadian waste disposal rates necessitate landfill gas monitoring and accurate forecasting. CO2 estimates in LandGEM version 3.02 currently rest on the assumptions that CO2 is a function of CH4, where the two gases make up nearly 100% of landfill gas content, leading to overestimated CO2 collection estimates. A total of 25 cases (five formulas, five approaches) compared annual CO2 collection at four western Canadian landfills. Despite common use in literature, the 1:1 ratio of CH4 to CO2 was not recommended to forecast landfill gas collection in cold climates. The existing modelling approach significantly overestimated CO2 production in three of four sites, resulting in the highest residual sum of squares. Optimization resulted in the most accurate results for all formulas and approaches, which had the greatest reduction in residual sums of squares (RSS) over the default approach (60.1 to 97.7%). The 1.4 Ratio approach for L o:L o-CO2 yielded the second most accurate results for CO2 flow (mean RSS reduction of 50.2% for all sites and subsection models). The annual k-modified LandGEM calculated k's via two empirical formulas (based on precipitation) and yielded the lowest accuracy in 12 of 20 approaches. Unlike other studies, strong relationships between optimized annual k's and precipitation were not observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 collection; Canadian carbon emission; Cold climates; First-order decay model; Landfill gas modelling; Landfill residual gases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429269     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8990-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  15 in total

1.  Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties.

Authors:  Hamid R Amini; Debra R Reinhart; Kevin R Mackie
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 7.145

2.  Modelling of biogas extraction at an Italian landfill accepting mechanically and biologically treated municipal solid waste.

Authors:  Paolo S Calabrò; Sirio Orsi; Emiliano Gentili; Meoni Carlo
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2011-09-18

3.  A model to estimate the methane generation rate constant in sanitary landfills using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.

Authors:  Anurag Garg; Gopal Achari; Ramesh C Joshi
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2006-08

4.  Building a better methane generation model: Validating models with methane recovery rates from 35 Canadian landfills.

Authors:  Shirley Thompson; Jennifer Sawyer; Rathan Bonam; J E Valdivia
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 7.145

5.  Comparison of first-order-decay modeled and actual field measured municipal solid waste landfill methane data.

Authors:  Hamid R Amini; Debra R Reinhart; Antti Niskanen
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 6.  Controls on landfill gas collection efficiency: instantaneous and lifetime performance.

Authors:  Morton A Barlaz; Jeff P Chanton; Roger B Green
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Bacterial population development and chemical characteristics of refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill.

Authors:  M A Barlaz; D M Schaefer; R K Ham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Evaluation of landfill gas production and emissions in a MSW large-scale Experimental Cell in Brazil.

Authors:  Felipe Jucá Maciel; José Fernando Thomé Jucá
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 7.145

9.  Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems?

Authors:  K Spokas; J Bogner; J P Chanton; M Morcet; C Aran; C Graff; Y Moreau-Le Golvan; I Hebe
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 7.145

10.  Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines.

Authors:  Sangjae Jeong; Anwoo Nam; Seung-Muk Yi; Jae Young Kim
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.145

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of groundwater metal contaminant spatial distribution on overlaying kriged maps.

Authors:  Bahareh Fallah; Amy Richter; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Amgad Salama
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Use of seasonal parameters and their effects on FOD landfill gas modeling.

Authors:  Nathan Bruce; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Hoang Lan Vu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Evolution of COVID-19 municipal solid waste disposal behaviors using epidemiology-based periods defined by World Health Organization guidelines.

Authors:  Tanvir S Mahmud; Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng; Nima Karimi; Kenneth K Adusei; Stefania Pizzirani
Journal:  Sustain Cities Soc       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 10.696

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.