Literature DB >> 20101771

Patient interest in video recording of colonoscopy: a survey.

Meghana Raghavendra1, Douglas K Rex.   

Abstract

AIM: To find if patients are interested in obtaining a video recording of their colonoscopy procedure.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of outpatients presenting for colonoscopy regarding their interest in obtaining a video recording of their colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-eight patients (mean age 57.9 years; 57% male) were surveyed. Two hundred and one patients (81%) were interested in obtaining a video recording. No significant predictors of patients' interest in the video recording were identified. After reading a brief educational paragraph explaining missed lesions during colonoscopy, 135 patients (54%) were more interested in having a video recording, and none were less interested. One hundred and fifty-six patients (63%) were willing to pay for a video recording. In multivariable analyses, younger age was predictive of willingness to pay for a video recording. Prior history of colorectal cancer and a family history of colorectal cancer were predictive of willingness to pay a greater amount.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing colonoscopy expressed substantial interest in obtaining a videorecording of their procedure. Awareness of missing lesions during colonoscopy increased interest in having a videorecording.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101771      PMCID: PMC2811798          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  12 in total

1.  Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Donna Turner; Lin Xue; Laura E Targownik; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network.

Authors:  D S Alberts; M E Martínez; D J Roe; J M Guillén-Rodríguez; J R Marshall; J B van Leeuwen; M E Reid; C Ritenbaugh; P A Vargas; A B Bhattacharyya; D L Earnest; R E Sampliner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; E Lanza; D Corle; P Lance; F Iber; B Caan; M Shike; J Weissfeld; R Burt; M R Cooper; J W Kikendall; J Cahill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; E Robert Greenberg; Michael Beach; Robert S Sandler; Dennis Ahnen; Robert W Haile; Carol A Burke; Dale C Snover; Robert S Bresalier; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Jack S Mandel; John H Bond; Rosalind U Van Stolk; Robert W Summers; Richard Rothstein; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Tim Byers; Leila Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Zhongliang Chen; Deanna M Rothwell; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; Joseph J Vicari; Andrea S Doughty; John F Johanson; Roger L Greenlaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.

Authors:  Florence Aslinia; Lance Uradomo; Allison Steele; Bruce D Greenwald; Jean-Pierre Raufman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  3 in total

1.  Digital Recording and Documentation of Endoscopic Procedures: Do Patients and Doctors Think Alike?

Authors:  Nadav Willner; Maya Peled-Raz; Dan Shteinberg; Michal Shteinberg; Dean Keren; Tova Rainis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-23

2.  Audio-video recording during laparoscopic surgery reduces irrelevant conversation between surgeons: a cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah Bergström; Lars-Göran Larsson; Erik Stenberg
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Surgical flow disturbances in dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites: an observational study to assess its supposed superiority over conventional suites.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Sara R C Driessen; Sharon P Rodrigues; Johann P T Rhemrev; Maddy J G H Smeets; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.