Literature DB >> 16720822

Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies.

Harminder Singh1, Donna Turner, Lin Xue, Laura E Targownik, Charles N Bernstein.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Limited evidence exists to guide the optimal frequency of repeat endoscopic examination for colorectal cancer screening after a negative colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the duration and magnitude of the risk of developing colorectal cancer following performance of a negative colonoscopy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Population-based retrospective analysis of individuals whose colonoscopy evaluations did not result in a diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Patients who had been evaluated between April 1, 1989, and December 31, 2003, were identified using Manitoba Health's physician billing claims database (N = 35 975). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare colorectal cancer incidence in our cohort with colorectal cancer incidence in the provincial population. Stratified analysis was performed to determine the duration of the reduced risk. Patients with a history of colorectal cancer prior to the index colonoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, resective colorectal surgery, and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy within the 5 years before the index colonoscopy were excluded. Cohort members were followed up from the time of the index colonoscopy until diagnosis of colorectal cancer, death, out-migration from Manitoba, or end of the study period on December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of colorectal cancer.
RESULTS: A negative colonoscopy was associated with SIRs of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.81) at 6 months, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.56-0.78) at 1 year, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) at 2 years, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.73) at 5 years, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.09-0.65) at 10 years. The proportion of colorectal cancer located in the right side of the colon was significantly higher in the colonoscopy cohort than the rate in the Manitoba population (47% vs 28%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing colorectal cancer remains decreased for more than 10 years following the performance of a negative colonoscopy. There is a need to improve the early detection rate of right-sided colorectal neoplasia in usual clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720822     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  107 in total

1.  Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Population-based screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test--do we really have enough evidence?

Authors:  Göran Ekelund; Jonas Manjer; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Improving lesion detection during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-10

6.  Increased plasma levels of the APC-interacting protein MAPRE1, LRG1, and IGFBP2 preceding a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in women.

Authors:  Jon J Ladd; Tina Busald; Melissa M Johnson; Qing Zhang; Sharon J Pitteri; Hong Wang; Dean E Brenner; Paul D Lampe; Raju Kucherlapati; Ziding Feng; Ross L Prentice; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-01-25

7.  Screening options and recommendations for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy M Geiger; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

Review 8.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Richard Fallis; Duncan McVicar; Ann G Zauber; Frank Kee
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

10.  Polyp surveillance.

Authors:  W Donald Buie; Anthony R MacLean
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.