Literature DB >> 20100920

In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.

T Ulusu1, H Bodur, M E Odabaş.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic quality of a new wireless handheld unit (ADX4000; Dexcowin Co. Ltd, Korea) on conventional bitewings and its LCD screen for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth.
METHODS: In total, 108 approximal surfaces of primary teeth were examined in vitro by 3 observers. Conventional films were viewed under subdued lighting conditions on a conventional view box. Digital 3.5 inch images were displayed on the built-in monitor of the ADX4000 and digital 17 inch images were viewed on a 17 inch monitor. The true caries diagnosis was based on histological assessment of the approximal surfaces after sectioning the primary teeth. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)) analysis was used to assess the diagnostic quality of imaging modalities.
RESULTS: The areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.786 (digital 17 inch) to 0.813 (digital 3.5 inch). No statistically significant differences were found between the three modalities for detecting approximal caries.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the diagnostic quality of conventional film and digital images, which were exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit, was comparable.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100920      PMCID: PMC3520193          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15182314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  17 in total

1.  Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.

Authors:  M Abreu; A Mol; J B Ludlow
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-03

2.  Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.

Authors:  H Hintze; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.

Authors:  R Haak; M J Wicht; M J Noack
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.

Authors:  K Syriopoulos; G C Sanderink; X L Velders; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radiographic caries detection study.

Authors:  Hanne Hintze; Morten Frydenberg; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Swed Dent J Suppl       Date:  2007

7.  The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films.

Authors:  A Møystad; D B Svanaes; T A Larheim; H G Gröndahl
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.

Authors:  M Ohki; T Okano; T Nakamura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  The use of film holding, beam collimating and aiming devices in bitewing radiography. A suggested design for routine and research use.

Authors:  N B Pitts
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.

Authors:  A Wenzel; H Hintze; L Mikkelsen; F Mouyen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1991-11
View more
  11 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Johan K M Aps; Erwin Berkhout; Arthur D Goren
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of changes in dental and bone radiographic densities in the presence of different soft-tissue simulators using pixel intensity and digital subtraction analyses.

Authors:  R S de Molon; R G Batitucci; R Spin-Neto; G M Paquier; C E Sakakura; G M Tosoni; G Scaf
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies.

Authors:  L Schropp; N S Alyass; A Wenzel; A Stavropoulos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  The role of stationary intraoral tomosynthesis in reducing proximal overlap in bitewing radiography.

Authors:  Sally M Mauriello; Angela M Broome; Enrique Platin; André Mol; Christina Inscoe; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Kevin Moss
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.

Authors:  Sorin Teich; Wisam Al-Rawi; Masahiro Heima; Fady F Faddoul; Gil Goldzweig; Zvi Gutmacher; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 6.  Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  In vitro Evaluation of the Relationship between Gray Scales in Digital Intraoral Radiographs and Hounsfield Units in CT Scans.

Authors:  L Khojastepour; S Mohammadzadeh; M Jazayeri; M Omidi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Ismail Hakki Baltacioglu; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Assessment of endodontically treated teeth by using different radiographic methods: an ex vivo comparison between CBCT and other radiographic techniques.

Authors:  Kemal Özgür Demiralp; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Kahraman Güngör; Selcen Yüksel; Gokcen Demiralp; Ozlem Uçok
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21

10.  Image quality of a portable X-ray device (Nomad Pro 2) compared to a wall-mounted device in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Julia Nitschke; Lara Schorn; Henrik Holtmann; Uwe Zeller; Jörg Handschel; David Sonntag; Julian Lommen
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.