Literature DB >> 7835507

Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.

M Ohki1, T Okano, T Nakamura.   

Abstract

A number of factors may determine the diagnostic accuracy of digitized intraoral radiographs. Conventional film radiographs were digitized with three different digitizers, a laser-scanner, a drum-scanner and a TV camera. Digital images, varying in pixel size, grey level and image processing, were displayed on three different video-monitors and assessed by 10 dentists. The detectability of incipient proximal surface caries was used as an index of the diagnostic accuracy and the effect of the different factors compared by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Images digitized by the drum-scanner were found to have the best diagnostic accuracy. Sufficient diagnostic accuracy could be attained on the low-cost video monitor of a personal computer. Digital images with a pixel size of 100 microns and 32 grey levels were found to be acceptable for intraoral radiographs for diagnostic purposes. These results provide a practical guide for establishing a digital image acquiring system for any intraoral radiographs, reducing demands on data storage to a minimum.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7835507     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.23.2.7835507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  10 in total

1.  Does extracorporeal shock wave therapy enhance healing of osteochondritis dissecans of the rabbit knee?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Xue Cheng Liu; Martin Kubin; Joseph Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Evaluation of the quality of different endodontic obturation techniques by digital radiography.

Authors:  Larissa Dantas Fracassi; Eduardo Gomes Ferraz; Sílvio José Albergaria; Elaine Bauer Veeck; Nilza Pereira da Costa; Viviane Almeida Sarmento
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.

Authors:  B Senel; K Kamburoglu; O Uçok; S P Yüksel; T Ozen; H Avsever
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.

Authors:  C R G Xavier; Ana Claudia Araujo-Pires; M L Poleti; I R F Rubira-Bullen; O Ferreira; A L A Capelozza
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.

Authors:  T Ulusu; H Bodur; M E Odabaş
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Current status of dental caries diagnosis using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Jin-Soo Ahn; Ho-Beom Kwon; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-06-23

7.  Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries.

Authors:  Mehrdad Abdinian; Rahman Nazeri; Marzieh Ghaiour
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-07

8.  Effect of Filtration and Slice Thickness of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images on Occlusal Caries Detection: An Ex Vivo Study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Abdinian; Marzieh Ghaiour
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-09

9.  Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of a direct digital radiographic-CMOS image with four types of filtered images for the detection of occlusal caries.

Authors:  Rohit Kumar Sahu; Jagadish P Rajguru; Naina Pattnaiak; Debajyoti Bardhan; Bikash Nayak
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-01-28

10.  Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.

Authors:  Kholod Almanei; Rakan Alsulaimani; Sarah Alfadda; Sarah Albabtain; Reem Alsulaimani
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2017-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.