Literature DB >> 20100878

Activity of linezolid in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model using different dosages and Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis strains with and without a hypermutator phenotype.

Boubakar B Ba1, Corinne Arpin, Branly Bikie Bi Nso, Véronique Dubois, Marie-Claude Saux, Claudine Quentin.   

Abstract

The influence of antibiotic dosages and bacterial mutator phenotypes on the emergence of linezolid-resistant mutants was evaluated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. A twice-daily 0.5-h infusion of a 200-, 600-, or 800-mg dose for 48 h was simulated against four strains (MIC, 2 microg/ml): Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 and its mutator derivative MutS2, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and a mutator clinical strain of E. faecalis, Ef1497. The peak concentrations (4.38 to 4.79, 13.4 to 14.6, and 19.2 to 19.5 microg/ml) and half-lives at beta-phase (5.01 to 6.72 h) fit human plasma linezolid pharmacokinetics. Due to its bacteriostatic property, the cumulative percentages of the dosing interval during which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T > MIC), 66.6 and 69.1% of the dosing interval, were not significant, except for Ef1497, with an 800-mg dose and a T > MIC of 80.9%. At the standard 600-mg dosage, resistant mutants (2- to 8-fold MIC increases) were selected only with Ef1497. A lower, 200-mg dosage did not select resistant mutants of E. faecalis ATCC 29212, but a higher, 800-mg dosage against Ef1497 did not prevent their emergence. For the most resistant mutant (MIC, 16 microg/ml), characterization of 23S rRNA genes revealed the substitution A2453G in two of the four operons, which was previously described only in in vitro mutants of archaebacteria. Nevertheless, this mutant did not yield further mutants under 600- or 200-mg treatment. In conclusion, linezolid was consistently efficient against S. aureus strains. The emergence of resistant E. faecalis mutants was probably favored by the rapid decline of linezolid concentrations against a strong mutator, a phenotype less exceptional in E. faecalis than in S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100878      PMCID: PMC2849367          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01022-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  55 in total

1.  Intracellular accumulation of linezolid in Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii and Enterobacter aerogenes: role of enhanced efflux pump activity and inactivation.

Authors:  Anja Schumacher; Rainer Trittler; Jürgen A Bohnert; Klaus Kümmerer; Jean-Marie Pagès; Winfried V Kern
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Linezolid tissue penetration and serum activity against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in diabetic patients with foot infections.

Authors:  Gary E Stein; Sharon Schooley; Charles A Peloquin; Anne Missavage; Daniel H Havlichek
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: gene dosage effect, stability, fitness costs, and cross-resistances.

Authors:  Silke Besier; Albrecht Ludwig; Johannes Zander; Volker Brade; Thomas A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Dose dependence of emergence of resistance to linezolid in Enterococcus faecalis in vivo.

Authors:  Nadège Bourgeois-Nicolaos; Laurent Massias; Brigitte Couson; Marie-José Butel; Antoine Andremont; Florence Doucet-Populaire
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Role of hypermutability on bacterial fitness and emergence of resistance in experimental osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Claire Daurel; Anne-Laure Prunier; Françoise Chau; Louis Garry; Roland Leclercq; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-22

6.  Use of an in vitro pharmacodynamic model to derive a linezolid regimen that optimizes bacterial kill and prevents emergence of resistance in Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  A Louie; H S Heine; K Kim; D L Brown; B VanScoy; W Liu; M Kinzig-Schippers; F Sörgel; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Linezolid pharmacodynamics with Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Elena N Strukova; Maria V Smirnova; Sergey N Vostrov; Irene Y Lubenko; Alexander A Firsov; Stephen H Zinner; Yury A Portnoy
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Steven N Leonard; David R Andes; William A Craig; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  First report of cfr-mediated resistance to linezolid in human staphylococcal clinical isolates recovered in the United States.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Lalitagauri M Deshpande; Mariana Castanheira; Joseph DiPersio; Michael A Saubolle; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Selection of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an in vitro dynamic model: protective effect of doxycycline.

Authors:  Stephen H Zinner; Deborah Gilbert; Irene Yu Lubenko; Kenneth Greer; Alexander A Firsov
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vitro resistance studies with bacteria that exhibit low mutation frequencies: prediction of "antimutant" linezolid concentrations using a mixed inoculum containing both susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alexander A Firsov; Maria V Golikova; Elena N Strukova; Yury A Portnoy; Andrey V Romanov; Mikhail V Edelstein; Stephen H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Study comparing the effectiveness of chlorhexidine, calcium hydroxide and linezolid based medicaments against enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Rajdeep Pavaskar; Paul Chalakkal; Ramesh Krishnan; Saritha Sirikonda; Madhu Vasepalli; Pammi Venkataramana
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Rapid emergence of resistance to linezolid and mutator phenotypes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from an adult cystic fibrosis patient.

Authors:  Asmaa Tazi; Jeanne Chapron; Gerald Touak; Magalie Longo; Dominique Hubert; Gislène Collobert; Daniel Dusser; Claire Poyart; Philippe C Morand
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.