Literature DB >> 20096812

Exploring the membrane proteome--challenges and analytical strategies.

Andreas O Helbig1, Albert J R Heck, Monique Slijper.   

Abstract

The analysis of proteins in biological membranes forms a major challenge in proteomics. Despite continuous improvements and the development of more sensitive analytical methods, the analysis of membrane proteins has always been hampered by their hydrophobic properties and relatively low abundance. In this review, we describe recent successful strategies that have led to in-depth analyses of the membrane proteome. To facilitate membrane proteome analysis, it is essential that biochemical enrichment procedures are combined with special analytical workflows that are all optimized to cope with hydrophobic polypeptides. These include techniques for protein solubilization, and also well-matched developments in protein separation and protein digestion procedures. Finally, we discuss approaches to target membrane-protein complexes and lipid-protein interactions, as such approaches offer unique insights into function and architecture of cellular membranes. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20096812     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  38 in total

1.  Ligand-based receptor identification on living cells and tissues using TRICEPS.

Authors:  Andreas P Frei; Hansjoerg Moest; Karel Novy; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Improved recovery and identification of membrane proteins from rat hepatic cells using a centrifugal proteomic reactor.

Authors:  Hu Zhou; Fangjun Wang; Yuwei Wang; Zhibin Ning; Weimin Hou; Theodore G Wright; Meenakshi Sundaram; Shumei Zhong; Zemin Yao; Daniel Figeys
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 3.  Proteomic approaches in research of cyanobacterial photosynthesis.

Authors:  Natalia Battchikova; Martina Angeleri; Eva-Mari Aro
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Direct identification of ligand-receptor interactions on living cells and tissues.

Authors:  Andreas P Frei; Ock-Youm Jeon; Samuel Kilcher; Hansjoerg Moest; Lisa M Henning; Christian Jost; Andreas Plückthun; Jason Mercer; Ruedi Aebersold; Erick M Carreira; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics and Peptidomics for Systems Biology and Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Robert Cunningham; Di Ma; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2012-08-01

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry accelerates membrane protein analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Savas; Benjamin D Stein; Christine C Wu; John R Yates
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Rapid and effective removal of perfluorooctanoic acid from proteomics samples.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Rao Kadiyala; Vennela Mullangi; Xiang Zhou; Krishna M Vukoti; Masaru Miyagi
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Comparative Proteomics Analysis of Four Commonly Used Methods for Identification of Novel Plasma Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Kubra Karaosmanoglu Yoneten; Murat Kasap; Gurler Akpinar; Aylin Kanli; Erdal Karaoz
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  High-Throughput Proteomics Enabled by a Photocleavable Surfactant.

Authors:  Kyle A Brown; Trisha Tucholski; Christian Eken; Samantha Knott; Yanlong Zhu; Song Jin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Reproducible method to enrich membrane proteins with high purity and high yield for an LC-MS/MS approach in quantitative membrane proteomics.

Authors:  Xianyin Lai
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.