Literature DB >> 20095825

Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity.

Abby Grace Drake1, Christian Peter Klingenberg.   

Abstract

Abstract: The variation among domestic dog breeds offers a unique opportunity to study large-scale diversification by microevolutionary mechanisms. We use geometric morphometrics to quantify the diversity of skull shape in 106 breeds of domestic dog, in three wild canid species, and across the order Carnivora. The amount of shape variation among domestic dogs far exceeds that in wild species, and it is comparable to the disparity throughout the Carnivora. The greatest shape distances between dog breeds clearly surpass the maximum divergence between species in the Carnivora. Moreover, domestic dogs occupy a range of novel shapes outside the domain of wild carnivorans. The disparity among companion dogs substantially exceeds that of other classes of breeds, suggesting that relaxed functional demands facilitated diversification. Much of the diversity of dog skull shapes stems from variation between short and elongate skulls and from modularity of the face versus that of the neurocranium. These patterns of integration and modularity apply to variation among individuals and breeds, but they also apply to fluctuating asymmetry, indicating they have a shared developmental basis. These patterns of variation are also found for the wolf and across the Carnivora, suggesting that they existed before the domestication of dogs and are not a result of selective breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20095825     DOI: 10.1086/650372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  85 in total

Review 1.  The generation of variation and the developmental basis for evolutionary novelty.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather A Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Urs Schmidt-Ott; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication.

Authors:  Robert K Wayne; Bridgett M vonHoldt
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  The impact of artificial selection on morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of domestic horses.

Authors:  Pauline Hanot; Anthony Herrel; Claude Guintard; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The fossil record of phenotypic integration and modularity: A deep-time perspective on developmental and evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Anjali Goswami; Wendy J Binder; Julie Meachen; F Robin O'Keefe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Estimating the magnitude of morphoscapes: how to measure the morphological component of biodiversity in relation to habitats using geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Diego Fontaneto; Martina Panisi; Mauro Mandrioli; Dario Montardi; Maurizio Pavesi; Andrea Cardini
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-06-22

7.  Mapping morphological shape as a high-dimensional functional curve.

Authors:  Guifang Fu; Mian Huang; Wenhao Bo; Han Hao; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Comparative Anatomy of the Bony Labyrinth (Inner Ear) of Placental Mammals.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetics of Skeletal Evolution in Unusually Large Mice from Gough Island.

Authors:  Michelle D Parmenter; Melissa M Gray; Caley A Hogan; Irene N Ford; Karl W Broman; Christopher J Vinyard; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Quantitative genetic analysis of subspecific differences in body shape in the snail-feeding carabid beetle Damaster blaptoides.

Authors:  J Konuma; T Sota; S Chiba
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.