Literature DB >> 28642973

Estimating the magnitude of morphoscapes: how to measure the morphological component of biodiversity in relation to habitats using geometric morphometrics.

Diego Fontaneto1, Martina Panisi2, Mauro Mandrioli3, Dario Montardi3, Maurizio Pavesi4, Andrea Cardini5,6.   

Abstract

Ecological indicators are currently developed to account for the different facets of loss of biological diversity due to direct or indirect effects of human activities. Most ecological indicators include species richness as a metric. Others, such as functional traits and phylogenetic diversity, account for differences in species, even when species richness is the same. Here, we describe and apply a different indicator, called morphoscape dimension, accounting for morphological variability across habitats in a geographical region. We use the case of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in four different habitats in the Po Plain in Northern Italy to exemplify how to quantify the magnitude of the morphological space (i.e. the dimension of the morphoscape) occupied by the species in each habitat using geometric morphometrics. To this aim, we employed a variety of metrics of morphological disparity related to univariate size, and more complex multivariate shape and form. Our 'proof of concept' suggests that metrics assessing size and form might largely tend to simply mirror the information provided by species richness, whereas shape morphoscape disparity may be able to account for non-trivial differences in species traits amongst habitats. This is indicated by the woodland morphoscape being on average bigger than that of crops, the most species-rich habitat, despite having almost 20% less species. We conclude suggesting that the analysis of morphoscape dimension has the potential to become a new additional and complimentary tool in the hands of conservation biologists and ecologists to explore and quantify habitat complexity and inform decisions on management and conservation based on a wide set of ecological indicators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carabidae; Disparity; Landmarks; Procrustes geometric morphometrics; Shape

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28642973     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-017-1475-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  22 in total

Review 1.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology.

Authors:  Cyrille Violle; Brian J Enquist; Brian J McGill; Lin Jiang; Cécile H Albert; Catherine Hulshof; Vincent Jung; Julie Messier
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Time to automate identification.

Authors:  Norman MacLeod; Mark Benfield; Phil Culverhouse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach.

Authors:  S Pavoine; M B Bonsall
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-12-14

4.  Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe.

Authors:  Dagmar Schröter; Wolfgang Cramer; Rik Leemans; I Colin Prentice; Miguel B Araújo; Nigel W Arnell; Alberte Bondeau; Harald Bugmann; Timothy R Carter; Carlos A Gracia; Anne C de la Vega-Leinert; Markus Erhard; Frank Ewert; Margaret Glendining; Joanna I House; Susanna Kankaanpää; Richard J T Klein; Sandra Lavorel; Marcus Lindner; Marc J Metzger; Jeannette Meyer; Timothy D Mitchell; Isabelle Reginster; Mark Rounsevell; Santi Sabaté; Stephen Sitch; Ben Smith; Jo Smith; Pete Smith; Martin T Sykes; Kirsten Thonicke; Wilfried Thuiller; Gill Tuck; Sönke Zaehle; Bärbel Zierl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Understanding context dependence in the contribution of intraspecific variation to community trait-environment matching.

Authors:  Geneviève Lajoie; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species.

Authors:  William Fithian; Jane Elith; Trevor Hastie; David A Keith
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 7.781

8.  Deformities of chironomid larvae and heavy metal pollution: from laboratory to field studies.

Authors:  A Di Veroli; F Santoro; M Pallottini; R Selvaggi; F Scardazza; D Cappelletti; E Goretti
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; J Emmett Duffy; Andrew Gonzalez; David U Hooper; Charles Perrings; Patrick Venail; Anita Narwani; Georgina M Mace; David Tilman; David A Wardle; Ann P Kinzig; Gretchen C Daily; Michel Loreau; James B Grace; Anne Larigauderie; Diane S Srivastava; Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Rapid shape divergences between natural and introduced populations of a horned beetle partly mirror divergences between species.

Authors:  Astrid Pizzo; Angela Roggero; Claudia Palestrini; Armin P Moczek; Antonio Rolando
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.